feeldb

Looney Tunes: Back in Action

2003 · 92 min · Director: Joe Dante ★ IMDb 5.8 · 44,214 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck are up to their feuding ways again. Tired of playing second fiddle to Bugs, Daffy has decided to leave the Studio for good. He is aided by Warner Bros.' humor impaired Vice President of Comedy, Kate Houghton, who releases him from his contract and instructs WB security guard/aspiring stunt man DJ Drake to capture and "escort" Daffy off the studio lot. Suddenly a sidekick without a hero, the duck decides to ally himself with DJ, whether he likes it or not. Consequently, Daffy is on the scene when DJ discovers that his famous movie star father was Damian Drake, known for playing suave international spies onscreen, is actually a suave international spy in real life--and has been kidnapped by the evil insane nerdy, prancing villain known as Mr. Chairman of the equally nefarious Acme Corporation. It seems that Damian knows the whereabouts of the mysterious magical and powerful Blue Monkey Diamond, and the Chairman will do anything to get his hands on it! With Daffy in tow, DJ hits the road in a desperate attempt to outrace the evil Acme stooges to the diamond and save the world from their evil clutches. Unbeknownst to the two neo-spies, they are also being followed by VP Kate and Bugs--the studio brass has decided that the rabbit needs a comic foil after all, and Kate's job is on the line if she can't get Daffy back to work ASAP.

Trailer for Looney Tunes: Back in Action

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Looney Tunes: Back in Action (2003) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Excitement 25%, Surprise 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Humor35%
  2. Smile15%
  3. Awe5%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Excitement, Surprise. Genres: Comedy, Adventure, Animation. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Excitement and Surprise. Its IMDb rating of 5.8/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 56/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Humor
  • Excitement
  • Tension

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Excitement

Humor
Excitement
Tension
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Follow the emotional intensity across the film; hatched intervals indicate limited subtitle evidence.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityHumorExcitementTension
2.5 %≈ 2′Humor69 %68 %22 %18 %
7.5 %≈ 7′Humor66 %64 %25 %21 %
12.5 %≈ 12′Humor62 %60 %25 %21 %
17.5 %≈ 16′Humor61 %60 %24 %23 %
22.5 %≈ 21′Humor60 %59 %23 %23 %
27.5 %≈ 25′Humor62 %59 %34 %25 %
32.5 %≈ 30′Humor68 %61 %51 %40 %
37.5 %≈ 35′Humor69 %63 %50 %45 %
42.5 %≈ 39′Humor63 %60 %33 %35 %
47.5 %≈ 44′Humor60 %58 %23 %31 %
52.5 %≈ 48′Humor63 %57 %29 %39 %
57.5 %≈ 53′Humor66 %59 %39 %45 %
62.5 %≈ 58′Humor64 %60 %40 %40 %
67.5 %≈ 62′Humor61 %59 %36 %31 %
72.5 %≈ 67′Humor62 %59 %37 %34 %
77.5 %≈ 71′Humor66 %59 %43 %49 %
82.5 %≈ 76′Humor70 %56 %50 %60 %
87.5 %≈ 81′Excitement73 %56 %49 %50 %
92.5 %≈ 85′Humor70 %58 %35 %27 %
97.5 %≈ 90′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Man in a hole

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Joe Alaskey

Bugs Bunny-Daffy Duck / Beaky Buzzard / Sylvester / Mama Bear (voice)

Jeff Bennett

Yosemite Sam / Foghorn Leghorn / Nasty Canasta (voice)

Timothy Dalton

Damien Drake

Billy West

Elmer Fudd / Peter Lorre (voice)

HL
Heather Locklear

Dusty Tails

Joan Cusack

Mother

BG
Bill Goldberg

Mr. Smith

DS
Don Stanton

Mr. Warner

DS
Dan Stanton

Mr. Warner's Brother

Dick Miller

Security Guard

Roger Corman

Hollywood Director

Kevin McCarthy

Dr. Bennell

JG
Jeff Gordon

Jeff Gordon

Matthew Lillard

Matthew Lillard

Mary Woronov

Acme VP, Bad Ideas

Marc Lawrence

Acme VP, Stating the Obvious

Bill McKinney

Acme VP, Nitpicking

Details

Directed by
Joe Dante
Written by
Larry Doyle, Roger S.H. Schulman
Type
Animation
Released
2003
Runtime
92 min
Country
Germany, United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 5.8 · 44,214 ratings
Feels mostly
Humor
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.