Robot Chicken: Star Wars
2007 · 23 min · Director: Seth Green
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
The first of three Star Wars themed Robot Chicken parodies.
Emotional fingerprint
Robot Chicken: Star Wars (2007) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 45%, Smile 25%, Surprise 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Smile, Surprise. Genres: Action, Animation, Short. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Smile and Surprise. Its IMDb rating of 8.0/10 suggests a strong audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 76/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Surprise
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Surprise | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 1′ | Humor | 73 % | 73 % | 17 % | 3 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 77 % | 77 % | 18 % | 8 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 80 % | 80 % | 20 % | 9 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 4′ | Humor | 78 % | 76 % | 26 % | 13 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 5′ | Humor | 75 % | 73 % | 31 % | 19 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 6′ | Humor | 78 % | 76 % | 35 % | 16 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 80 % | 79 % | 38 % | 14 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Humor | 76 % | 74 % | 35 % | 16 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 10′ | Humor | 73 % | 71 % | 31 % | 18 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Humor | 78 % | 78 % | 27 % | 15 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Humor | 82 % | 81 % | 24 % | 14 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Humor | 80 % | 79 % | 28 % | 16 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Humor | 79 % | 78 % | 33 % | 14 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Humor | 80 % | 79 % | 31 % | 9 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Humor | 82 % | 81 % | 29 % | 9 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Humor | 81 % | 81 % | 25 % | 9 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Humor | 80 % | 80 % | 24 % | 8 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Humor | 79 % | 79 % | 23 % | 9 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Humor | 69 % | 68 % | 16 % | 8 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Humor | 55 % | 52 % | 12 % | 3 % |
Oedipus
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Robot Chicken: Star Wars. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Luke Skywalker (Empire on Ice) / Wuher / Boy (voice)
Princess Leia Organa (Empire On Ice) (voice)
Mas Amedda (archive sound) (uncredited)
Details
- Directed by
- Seth Green
- Written by
- Seth Green, Matthew Senreich, Douglas Goldstein, Tom Root, Breckin Meyer, Erik Weiner, Jordan Allen-Dutton, Mike Fasolo, Charles Horn, Hugh Sterbakov, Doug Goldstein
- Type
- Animation
- Released
- 2007
- Runtime
- 23 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
