A Charlie Brown Christmas
1965 · 25 min · Director: Bill Melendez
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
When Charlie Brown complains about the overwhelming materialism that he sees amongst everyone during the Christmas season, Lucy suggests that he become director of the school Christmas pageant. Charlie Brown accepts, but it is a frustrating struggle. When an attempt to restore the proper spirit with a forlorn little fir Christmas tree fails, he needs Linus' help to learn the meaning of Christmas.
Emotional fingerprint
A Charlie Brown Christmas (1965) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Nostalgia 30%, Joy 25%, Empathy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Nostalgia, Joy, Empathy. Genres: Comedy, Animation, Family. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Nostalgia, Joy and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 8.3/10 suggests a strong audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 74/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Empathy
- Joy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Empathy | Joy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 1′ | Sadness | 45 % | 8 % | 43 % | 0 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Sadness | 46 % | 24 % | 43 % | 3 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 50 % | 43 % | 38 % | 8 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 4′ | Humor | 53 % | 51 % | 29 % | 9 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 6′ | Humor | 51 % | 51 % | 28 % | 6 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 51 % | 51 % | 27 % | 6 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Humor | 51 % | 51 % | 26 % | 8 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Humor | 49 % | 49 % | 26 % | 8 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Humor | 51 % | 51 % | 21 % | 8 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Humor | 55 % | 55 % | 19 % | 6 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Humor | 54 % | 54 % | 19 % | 6 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Humor | 50 % | 46 % | 21 % | 8 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Hope | 46 % | 34 % | 31 % | 10 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Hope | 49 % | 35 % | 31 % | 14 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Humor | 56 % | 43 % | 31 % | 11 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Empathy | 63 % | 29 % | 50 % | 10 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Empathy | 64 % | 8 % | 53 % | 20 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Hope | 61 % | 1 % | 43 % | 25 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Empathy | 64 % | 5 % | 48 % | 31 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Joy | 70 % | 8 % | 50 % | 50 % |
Rags to riches
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Details
- Directed by
- Bill Melendez
- Written by
- Charles M. Schulz
- Type
- Animation
- Released
- 1965
- Runtime
- 25 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Nostalgia
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
