Hoppers
2026 · 104 min · Director: Daniel Chong
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Scientists have discovered how to "hop" human consciousness into lifelike robotic animals, allowing people to communicate with animals as animals. Animal lover Mabel seizes an opportunity to use the technology, uncovering mysteries within the animal world that are beyond anything she could have imagined.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Hoppers (2026) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Curiosity 30%, Awe 25%, Excitement 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Curiosity30%
- Awe25%
- Excitement20%
- Humor15%
- Love10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Curiosity, Awe, Excitement. Genres: Comedy, Animation, Family. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Curiosity, Awe and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 7.2/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 71/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Empathy
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Empathy | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 48 % | 40 % | 40 % | 25 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Empathy | 50 % | 36 % | 44 % | 30 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Humor | 53 % | 40 % | 36 % | 32 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Curiosity | 60 % | 48 % | 25 % | 39 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Curiosity | 64 % | 51 % | 30 % | 41 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Humor | 60 % | 53 % | 40 % | 34 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Humor | 59 % | 51 % | 45 % | 29 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Humor | 60 % | 45 % | 51 % | 26 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Empathy | 61 % | 41 % | 49 % | 38 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Tension | 66 % | 44 % | 45 % | 56 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Empathy | 69 % | 46 % | 55 % | 56 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Humor | 70 % | 55 % | 56 % | 52 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Humor | 74 % | 55 % | 50 % | 61 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Tension | 73 % | 40 % | 56 % | 61 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Sadness | 74 % | 35 % | 61 % | 59 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Tension | 79 % | 29 % | 54 % | 69 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Tension | 75 % | 19 % | 49 % | 56 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Empathy | 63 % | 28 % | 46 % | 21 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 96′ | Humor | 52 % | 38 % | 37 % | 5 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 101′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Hoppers. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Hoppers — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Nisha (voice)
Tom Lizard (voice)
Grandma Tanaka (voice)
Young Mabel (voice)
Insect Prince (voice)
Details
- Directed by
- Daniel Chong
- Written by
- Daniel Chong, Jesse Andrews
- Type
- Animation
- Released
- 2026
- Runtime
- 104 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Curiosity
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





