The Fourth Protocol
1987 · 119 min · Director: John Mackenzie
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
K.G.B. Agent Major Valeri Petrofsky has been reassigned at the request of the K.G.B. Chairman for a secret mission wherein he is sent to England to establish a residence near an American military base and receive various items from couriers from the U.S.S.R. John Preston is the top British spy catcher, currently at odds with his superior because he doesn't lick his boots. After he conducts an operation without his superior's permission which caused his superior some embarrassment, he is reassigned to the menial task of overseeing airports and ports. One day, one the couriers Petrofsky was expecting comes off of a freighter and has an accident which leaves him dead. Preston is informed by the pathologist that the man is not a seaman, so Preston goes through his things and finds that he was carrying something which he is told is an atomic bomb component. Preston now suspects that someone is bringing in parts for an atomic bomb, his superior doesn't want to let Preston be proven right, so he doesn't authorize further action and suspends Preston. But a man who works with Intelligence approaches Preston saying he might be right because a sleeper transmitter went active twice, once probably to alert Moscow that he is in place, and the second sent after the man's death probably to inform that the component he was delivering wasn't received. So the man offers to let Preston find the man who is bringing in the bomb. Back in the U.S.S.R., Petrofsky's boss is so disgruntled, that Petrofsky and so much of his department's resources are being taken by the Chairman for his op, that he calls his old friend, the Vice Chairman of the K.G.B., to find out what's going on, because he believes that the Chairman wouldn't be able to do any of these things without his friend's input. But his friend is just as incredulous as he is. So he tries to find out what the Chairman is up to.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
The Fourth Protocol (1987) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Tension 35%, Anxiety 30%, Curiosity 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Tension35%
- Anxiety30%
- Curiosity20%
- Excitement10%
- Relief5%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Tension, Anxiety, Curiosity. Genres: Thriller. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Tension, Anxiety and Curiosity. Its IMDb rating of 6.5/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 70/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Curiosity
- Fear
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Anger
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Curiosity | Fear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 37 % | 23 % | 42 % | 3 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Curiosity | 40 % | 30 % | 41 % | 6 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Tension | 43 % | 36 % | 40 % | 8 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Curiosity | 44 % | 39 % | 44 % | 9 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Curiosity | 48 % | 41 % | 50 % | 11 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Curiosity | 49 % | 41 % | 50 % | 14 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 48 % | 50 % | 24 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Tension | 60 % | 55 % | 49 % | 32 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Anger | 56 % | 51 % | 44 % | 29 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Curiosity | 59 % | 54 % | 51 % | 34 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Tension | 64 % | 60 % | 59 % | 39 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Curiosity | 65 % | 63 % | 50 % | 40 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Tension | 75 % | 73 % | 38 % | 57 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Tension | 80 % | 79 % | 39 % | 62 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Tension | 78 % | 78 % | 44 % | 54 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Tension | 81 % | 81 % | 39 % | 60 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Tension | 86 % | 86 % | 34 % | 70 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 104′ | Tension | 83 % | 75 % | 34 % | 58 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 110′ | Anger | 73 % | 53 % | 38 % | 32 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 116′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about The Fourth Protocol. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about The Fourth Protocol — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Carmichael
Prof. Krilov
Major Pavlov
Details
- Directed by
- John Mackenzie
- Written by
- Richard Burridge, George Axelrod, Frederick Forsyth
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1987
- Runtime
- 119 min
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Genres
- Thriller
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Tension
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





