Hope and Glory
1987 · 113 min · Director: John Boorman
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A semi-autobiographical project by John Boorman about a nine year old boy called Bill as he grows up in London during the blitz of World War II. For a young boy, this time in history was more of an adventure, a total upheaval of order, restrictions and discipline. The liberating effect of the war on the women left behind. And the joy when Hitler blows up your school.
Emotional fingerprint
Hope and Glory (1987) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Nostalgia 30%, Humor 25%, Awe 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Nostalgia, Humor, Awe. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Nostalgia, Humor and Awe. Its IMDb rating of 7.3/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 72/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Joy
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Joy | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Tension | 47 % | 23 % | 13 % | 37 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Humor | 51 % | 33 % | 21 % | 33 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Sadness | 63 % | 30 % | 19 % | 41 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Tension | 66 % | 23 % | 10 % | 54 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Humor | 58 % | 34 % | 16 % | 45 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Humor | 55 % | 46 % | 30 % | 36 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Humor | 65 % | 36 % | 28 % | 50 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Tension | 71 % | 25 % | 19 % | 61 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Humor | 65 % | 29 % | 23 % | 52 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Empathy | 63 % | 35 % | 29 % | 49 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Humor | 64 % | 39 % | 30 % | 45 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Empathy | 61 % | 40 % | 29 % | 34 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Humor | 60 % | 38 % | 25 % | 30 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Sadness | 65 % | 26 % | 20 % | 29 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Sadness | 68 % | 25 % | 23 % | 25 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Humor | 61 % | 44 % | 35 % | 19 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Humor | 60 % | 54 % | 45 % | 23 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 99′ | Joy | 64 % | 50 % | 50 % | 35 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 105′ | Joy | 66 % | 51 % | 56 % | 34 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 110′ | Joy | 68 % | 57 % | 62 % | 25 % |
Rags to riches
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Sue Rohan
Grandma
Faith
Hope
Clive's Pal
WVS Woman
Headmaster
Teacher
Roger
Roger's Gang #1
Roger's Gang #2
Details
- Directed by
- John Boorman
- Written by
- John Boorman
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1987
- Runtime
- 113 min
- Country
- United Kingdom, United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Nostalgia
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
