feeldb

Bull Durham

1988 · 108 min · Director: Ron Shelton, Ron Shelton ★ IMDb 7 · 63,774 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

It's the start of the minor league baseball season, and Annie Savoy, for who baseball is *the* religion, is going through the annual process of choosing the one player on her home team of the Durham Bulls of the Carolina League, he who she will take under her wings, sexual and otherwise, solely for the season, and who has always gone on to have his best year as a player. She has narrowed her choice to two recent acquires: Ebby Calvin LaLoosh, the wild neophyte pitcher with a wicked fastball - the pitch on which he solely relies - but can't aim, the more he thinks about it, the more erratic the pitch gets, while he doesn't appreciate anyone criticizing him or it in believing he knows best in his lack of self-awareness; and catcher Crash Davis, the veteran who has been around the minor leagues for twelve years and who was brought in solely to harness and reign in Ebby's power. While Ebby would gladly accept Annie's offer in seeing sex as an inherent part of his being, Crash, who is as philosophical in being a thinker as he is athletic, takes himself out of the running - the first player ever to do so - as, although attracted to her, does not see sex as the "game" she seems to treat it, especially as he knows he is nearing the end of his baseball playing career. Part of Annie's initial transformation of Ebby is to give him that nickname he sorely wants - Nuke - to match his pitches. Thus begins Annie, Crash and Nuke's three-way season-long relationship as they evolve because of it as baseball, sexual and human beings.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Bull Durham

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Bull Durham (1988) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Love 25%, Excitement 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

30%Humor
25%Love
  1. Humor30%
  2. Love25%
  3. Smile15%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Love, Excitement. Genres: Comedy, Romance, Sport. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Love and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 7.0/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 71/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Humor
  • Joy
  • Love

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Joy

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Love

Humor
Joy
Love
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Follow the emotional intensity across the film; hatched intervals indicate limited subtitle evidence.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityHumorJoyLove
2.5 %≈ 3′Humor43 %43 %22 %10 %
7.5 %≈ 8′Humor48 %48 %24 %6 %
12.5 %≈ 14′Humor51 %51 %24 %11 %
17.5 %≈ 19′Humor53 %53 %23 %20 %
22.5 %≈ 24′Humor50 %48 %20 %23 %
27.5 %≈ 30′Humor46 %41 %16 %21 %
32.5 %≈ 35′Humor45 %41 %15 %16 %
37.5 %≈ 41′Humor44 %40 %13 %10 %
42.5 %≈ 46′Humor44 %40 %15 %8 %
47.5 %≈ 51′Humor48 %46 %25 %10 %
52.5 %≈ 57′Humor54 %48 %38 %11 %
57.5 %≈ 62′Joy57 %45 %46 %11 %
62.5 %≈ 68′Humor55 %49 %36 %16 %
67.5 %≈ 73′Humor53 %51 %21 %21 %
72.5 %≈ 78′Humor50 %44 %20 %23 %
77.5 %≈ 84′Sadness48 %31 %26 %24 %
82.5 %≈ 89′Sadness50 %26 %30 %33 %
87.5 %≈ 95′Love50 %27 %25 %38 %
92.5 %≈ 100′Sadness50 %25 %24 %39 %
97.5 %≈ 105′Love57 %23 %32 %50 %
Oedipus

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Bull Durham. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Bull Durham — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Kevin Costner

Crash Davis

Susan Sarandon

Annie Savoy

TW
Trey Wilson

Skip

RW
Robert Wuhl

Larry

WO
William O'Leary

Jimmy

DN
David Neidorf

Bobby

DG
Danny Gans

Deke

TS
Tom Silardi

Tony

JR
Jenny Robertson

Millie

RM
Rick Marzan

Jose

GB
George Buck

Nuke's Father

LT
Lloyd T. Williams

Mickey

MP
Max Patkin

Self

GA
Gregory Avellone

Doc

GB
Garland Bunting

Teddy (Radio Announcer)

RD
Robert Dickman

Whitey

TK
Timothy Kirk

Ed

DD
Don Davis

Scared Batter

SW
Stephen Ware

Umpire

Details

Type
Movies
Released
1988
Runtime
108 min
Country
United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 7 · 63,774 ratings
Feels mostly
Humor
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.