Critters 2: The Main Course
1988 · 86 min · Director: Mick Garris
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A batch of unhatched critter eggs are mistaken for Easter eggs by the country-folk inhabitants of Grover's Bend and, before long, the ferocious furballs are on the rampage again.
Emotional fingerprint
Critters 2: The Main Course (1988) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Fear 25%, Excitement 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor35%
- Fear25%
- Excitement20%
- Surprise10%
- Tension10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Fear, Excitement. Genres: Comedy, Horror, Sci-Fi. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Fear and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 5.6/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 59/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Fear
- Humor
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Fear | Humor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Tension | 32 % | 30 % | 17 % | 17 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 6′ | Humor | 30 % | 21 % | 11 % | 23 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Humor | 34 % | 14 % | 6 % | 31 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Humor | 39 % | 19 % | 8 % | 34 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Humor | 39 % | 26 % | 13 % | 31 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Humor | 36 % | 20 % | 11 % | 30 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Sadness | 36 % | 14 % | 8 % | 31 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Humor | 41 % | 26 % | 15 % | 30 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Tension | 51 % | 48 % | 31 % | 29 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Tension | 55 % | 51 % | 36 % | 33 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Humor | 54 % | 46 % | 34 % | 30 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Tension | 64 % | 59 % | 44 % | 20 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Tension | 71 % | 69 % | 50 % | 16 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Tension | 68 % | 66 % | 44 % | 23 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Tension | 68 % | 68 % | 41 % | 24 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Tension | 74 % | 74 % | 48 % | 19 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Tension | 80 % | 80 % | 56 % | 16 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Tension | 78 % | 64 % | 46 % | 19 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Relief | 60 % | 24 % | 16 % | 30 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Humor | 43 % | 2 % | 0 % | 37 % |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Megan
Cindy
Bus Driver
Quigley
Lee
Lee / Ug "Nothing-Face"
Farmer
Farm Woman
Details
- Directed by
- Mick Garris
- Written by
- Mick Garris, David Twohy
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1988
- Runtime
- 86 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
