feeldb

God of Gamblers

1989 · 126 min · Director: Jing Wong, Wong Jing ★ IMDb 7.2 · 7,444 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Do San (the God of gamblers) is a legendary gambler helped by his supernatural abilities. He undertakes to help a friend pay a debt by beating his friend's advisory at the card table. Despite being assigned a bodyguard Do San has a freak accident which leaves him with partial memory loss and at a mental stage of a child. The small time hustler Knife, his side-kick and his girl friend, being responsible for the accident takes care of the retarded Do San. After some time they discover that he has not lost all of his powers and takes him on a round at the local gambling halls. After being chased by both Knife's loan-shark and enemies closer to the home of Do San, a final showdown at the card tables may take place.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for God of Gamblers

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

God of Gamblers (1989) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Excitement 35%, Humor 25%, Surprise 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Humor25%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Excitement, Humor, Surprise. Genres: Comedy, Adventure, Action. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Excitement, Humor and Surprise. Its IMDb rating of 7.2/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 72/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Tension
  • Satisfaction
  • Sympathy

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Satisfaction

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Sympathy

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Tension
Satisfaction
Sympathy
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then peaks around 93 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityTensionSatisfactionSympathy
2.5 %≈ 3′Satisfaction42 %30 %30 %2 %
7.5 %≈ 9′Satisfaction43 %29 %30 %4 %
12.5 %≈ 16′Humor45 %33 %26 %5 %
17.5 %≈ 22′Tension51 %44 %23 %11 %
22.5 %≈ 28′Tension56 %46 %14 %30 %
27.5 %≈ 35′Sympathy57 %39 %11 %41 %
32.5 %≈ 41′Humor58 %34 %24 %33 %
37.5 %≈ 47′Satisfaction56 %30 %31 %21 %
42.5 %≈ 54′Humor59 %31 %20 %30 %
47.5 %≈ 60′Sympathy68 %43 %8 %45 %
52.5 %≈ 66′Humor69 %54 %6 %39 %
57.5 %≈ 72′Tension65 %60 %16 %36 %
62.5 %≈ 79′Tension70 %68 %24 %43 %
67.5 %≈ 85′Tension79 %78 %18 %48 %
72.5 %≈ 91′Tension80 %74 %14 %59 %
77.5 %≈ 98′Sadness73 %60 %13 %53 %
82.5 %≈ 104′Tension71 %65 %13 %26 %
87.5 %≈ 110′Tension80 %74 %34 %13 %
92.5 %≈ 117′Satisfaction85 %68 %63 %13 %
97.5 %≈ 123′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Man in a hole

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about God of Gamblers. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about God of Gamblers — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

JW
Joey Wong

Jane

CH
Charles Heung

Lung Ng

LF
Lung Fong

Ko Yee

BH
Bau Hon-Lam

Chan Kam Sing

YC
Yeung Chak-Lam

Nam

SF
Shing Fui-On

Big Mouth

Richard Ng Man-Tat

Loanshark Shing

RW
Ronald Wong

Crawl

WS
Wong San

Jane's Father

SY
Seung-Goon Yuk

Jane's Mother

LC
Law Ching-Ho

Motel Manager

MN
Michiko Nishiwaki

Miss Chi

LC
Luk Chuen

Mr. Wang

DC
Dennis Chan Kwok-San

Doctor Toneg Wong

SY
Strawberry Yeung Yuk-Mui

Waitress Asked to Deal Cards

WJ
Wong Jing

Whoremonger in Love Motel

CL
Chan Lap-Ban

Knife's Mother

Details

Directed by
Jing Wong, Wong Jing
Written by
Jing Wong, Wong Jing, Albert Mak Kai-Kwong
Type
Movies
Released
1989
Runtime
126 min
Country
Hong Kong
Ratings
★ IMDb 7.2 · 7,444 ratings
Feels mostly
Excitement
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.