Pacific Heights
1990 · 102 min · Director: John Schlesinger
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
San Franciscans Drake Goodman and Patty Palmer are taking their relationship to the next level not only by moving in together, but their new abode being a house they purchase. Despite it being slightly outside of their price range and only affordable to them in the right circumstances, they purchase a Victorian house in Pacific Heights. Those circumstances include making all the necessary renovations on their own, and immediately renting out the two suites on the main floor at a specific price point. While they rent out the rear one bedroom unit to the Watanabes without incident, outwardly wealthy Carter Hayes is able to manipulate his way into renting the front studio apartment, partly in promising to pay half a year's rent in advance. Drake and Patty eventually learn that Carter, whose money they do not receive, is in the "business" of causing havoc in such rental situations to ruin the owners financially, he being the tenant from hell. In Carter seemingly knowing how to manipulate the system to his benefit including the proverbial possession being nine-tenths of the law, Drake and Patty also learn from the police and Stephanie MacDonald, the property lawyer they hire to help evict Carter and who they cannot afford, that the law is on Carter's side, the process to get him out costly and time consuming. As the battle between Drake/Patty and Carter escalates, which also includes the Watanabes being caught in the crossfire, it becomes potentially deadly if either side crosses a breaking point.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Pacific Heights (1990) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anxiety 35%, Tension 25%, Disturbing 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Anxiety35%
- Tension25%
- Disturbing20%
- Fear15%
- Anger5%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Anxiety, Tension, Disturbing. Genres: Thriller, Drama, Mystery. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Anxiety, Tension and Disturbing. Its IMDb rating of 6.4/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 68/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Anxiety
- Sadness
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Anxiety
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Anxiety | Sadness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Tension | 48 % | 42 % | 33 % | 7 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Curiosity | 34 % | 24 % | 23 % | 3 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Curiosity | 28 % | 15 % | 15 % | 0 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Curiosity | 34 % | 24 % | 20 % | 0 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Curiosity | 40 % | 35 % | 30 % | 1 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Tension | 48 % | 45 % | 40 % | 4 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Tension | 55 % | 50 % | 48 % | 8 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Anxiety | 58 % | 49 % | 51 % | 14 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Anxiety | 63 % | 53 % | 56 % | 23 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Anxiety | 74 % | 63 % | 64 % | 41 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Sadness | 80 % | 68 % | 68 % | 59 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Anxiety | 75 % | 65 % | 64 % | 51 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Tension | 68 % | 59 % | 55 % | 40 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Sadness | 64 % | 53 % | 46 % | 34 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Curiosity | 60 % | 49 % | 40 % | 16 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 79′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 48 % | 35 % | 4 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Tension | 53 % | 45 % | 31 % | 5 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 89′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 49 % | 39 % | 10 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 94′ | Tension | 58 % | 49 % | 44 % | 9 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 99′ | Relief | 43 % | 32 % | 32 % | 3 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Mira Watanabe
Bank Teller
Precinct Cop
Revilla
Details
- Directed by
- John Schlesinger
- Written by
- Daniel Pyne
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1990
- Runtime
- 102 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Anxiety
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
-
Kanopy
Opens in a new tab
-
Fawesome
Opens in a new tab
-
Philo
Opens in a new tab
-
The Roku Channel
Opens in a new tab
-
Fandango at Home Free
Opens in a new tab
-
Pluto TV
Opens in a new tab
-
Shout! Factory TV
Opens in a new tab
-
YouTube Free
Opens in a new tab
-
Amazon Prime Video Free with Ads
Opens in a new tab
-
Tubi TV
Opens in a new tab
-
Amazon MX Player
Opens in a new tab
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





