Enchanted April
1991 · 95 min · Director: Mike Newell
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
This slow-paced gem is about the civilizing influence of Italy on beleaguered Londoners, both male and female, and has its own civilizing influence on the viewer. It's almost like taking a little mini-trip to Italy, a gorgeously filmed enchantment.
Emotional fingerprint
Enchanted April (1991) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Awe 30%, Hope 25%, Love 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Awe, Hope, Love. Genres: Drama. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Awe, Hope and Love. Its IMDb rating of 7.3/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 71/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Joy
- Hope
- Love
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Joy | Hope | Love |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Hope | 42 % | 13 % | 37 % | 2 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Hope | 43 % | 10 % | 34 % | 5 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Humor | 41 % | 8 % | 26 % | 6 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Humor | 40 % | 11 % | 26 % | 4 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Hope | 43 % | 16 % | 31 % | 4 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 26′ | Humor | 52 % | 30 % | 35 % | 11 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Joy | 59 % | 42 % | 35 % | 18 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Humor | 51 % | 31 % | 30 % | 15 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Humor | 49 % | 28 % | 35 % | 26 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Love | 54 % | 38 % | 45 % | 43 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Hope | 53 % | 36 % | 43 % | 34 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Humor | 49 % | 32 % | 38 % | 20 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Hope | 49 % | 35 % | 40 % | 25 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Love | 50 % | 36 % | 43 % | 34 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Hope | 48 % | 34 % | 43 % | 31 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Hope | 50 % | 38 % | 43 % | 38 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Love | 60 % | 49 % | 44 % | 55 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Joy | 64 % | 56 % | 45 % | 60 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Joy | 59 % | 53 % | 39 % | 46 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Joy | 53 % | 45 % | 28 % | 28 % |
Rags to riches
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Enchanted April. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Lottie Wilkins
Jonathan
Patrick
Beppo
Francesca
Details
- Directed by
- Mike Newell
- Written by
- Elizabeth von Arnim, Peter Barnes, Peter Barnes
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1991
- Runtime
- 95 min
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Genres
- Drama
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Awe
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
