feeldb

Grand Canyon

1991 · 134 min · Director: Lawrence Kasdan ★ IMDb 6.8 · 17,615 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

The intertwined stories of a group of Angelenos are told, the stories largely a lament of Los Angeles being a city not their own if it ever was. The stories are also split largely by the black/white race divide. Centered on the black side is Simon, a widowed tow truck driver with a deaf daughter away at college. Simon has an understanding of the gang violence that surrounds his neighborhood, especially as his teenage nephew Otis - Simon's single-mother sister Deborah's eldest offspring - is part of a gang, what he believes he has to do to survive in the short term regardless of the consequences. Centered on the white side is Mack, an immigration lawyer who acts largely on impulse only thinking of the implications of his actions after the fact if at all. He also has an unconscious want to be liked. An example of the latter is something he does for Jane, the friend of his paralegal Dee, only seconds after he meets her for the first time, Dee who better understands his actions but doesn't much like them. Mack's wife Claire is at a crossroads in life in their fifteen year old son, Roberto, needing his parents less and less. What Claire sees as a sign to renew her life is only the most visible issue in a long line of issues that demonstrate the unspoken problems in their marriage. The one person whose story is told that is somewhat outside of this lament is Mack's best friend, Davis, a successful producer whose movies, as per his want, must have the "money shot" of the proverbial and literal head exploding in whatever violent action.

Trailer for Grand Canyon

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Grand Canyon (1991) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Empathy 30%, Sadness 25%, Anger 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

20%Anger
  1. Anger20%
  2. Hope10%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Empathy, Sadness, Anger. Genres: Drama, Crime. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Empathy, Sadness and Anger. Its IMDb rating of 6.8/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 70/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Tension
  • Empathy
  • Love

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Love

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Empathy

Dominant emotion: Hope

Tension
Empathy
Love
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then peaks around 13 %, then dips around 53 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityTensionEmpathyLove
2.5 %≈ 3′Tension42 %38 %12 %3 %
7.5 %≈ 10′Tension57 %56 %21 %6 %
12.5 %≈ 17′Tension63 %63 %27 %10 %
17.5 %≈ 23′Tension56 %51 %31 %20 %
22.5 %≈ 30′Love53 %39 %41 %30 %
27.5 %≈ 37′Sadness50 %27 %44 %31 %
32.5 %≈ 44′Love46 %25 %38 %29 %
37.5 %≈ 50′Empathy51 %41 %39 %23 %
42.5 %≈ 57′Tension58 %49 %41 %21 %
47.5 %≈ 64′Hope50 %33 %35 %26 %
52.5 %≈ 70′Empathy42 %25 %34 %24 %
57.5 %≈ 77′Empathy42 %29 %36 %19 %
62.5 %≈ 84′Hope42 %30 %34 %20 %
67.5 %≈ 90′Tension44 %32 %34 %24 %
72.5 %≈ 97′Hope49 %36 %37 %26 %
77.5 %≈ 104′Tension58 %49 %44 %19 %
82.5 %≈ 111′Tension63 %59 %47 %16 %
87.5 %≈ 117′Tension60 %49 %44 %27 %
92.5 %≈ 124′Love56 %28 %37 %41 %
97.5 %≈ 131′Hope54 %12 %32 %43 %
Rags to riches

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Jeremy Sisto

Roberto

Tina Lifford

Deborah

PM
Patrick Malone

Otis

ST
Sarah Trigger

Vanessa

RM
Randle Mell

The Alley Baron

DD
Destinee DeWalt

Kelley

CM
Candace Mead

Claire's Baby

LM
Lauren Mead

Claire's Baby

SB
Shaun Baker

Rocstar

DS
Deon Sams

Jimmy

CM
Christopher M. Brown

Rotor

GD
Gregg Dandridge

Eddie

Details

Directed by
Lawrence Kasdan
Written by
Lawrence Kasdan, Meg Kasdan, Meg Kasdan
Type
Movies
Released
1991
Runtime
134 min
Country
United States
Genres
Drama, Crime
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.8 · 17,615 ratings
Feels mostly
Empathy
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.