Grand Canyon
1991 · 134 min · Director: Lawrence Kasdan
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
The intertwined stories of a group of Angelenos are told, the stories largely a lament of Los Angeles being a city not their own if it ever was. The stories are also split largely by the black/white race divide. Centered on the black side is Simon, a widowed tow truck driver with a deaf daughter away at college. Simon has an understanding of the gang violence that surrounds his neighborhood, especially as his teenage nephew Otis - Simon's single-mother sister Deborah's eldest offspring - is part of a gang, what he believes he has to do to survive in the short term regardless of the consequences. Centered on the white side is Mack, an immigration lawyer who acts largely on impulse only thinking of the implications of his actions after the fact if at all. He also has an unconscious want to be liked. An example of the latter is something he does for Jane, the friend of his paralegal Dee, only seconds after he meets her for the first time, Dee who better understands his actions but doesn't much like them. Mack's wife Claire is at a crossroads in life in their fifteen year old son, Roberto, needing his parents less and less. What Claire sees as a sign to renew her life is only the most visible issue in a long line of issues that demonstrate the unspoken problems in their marriage. The one person whose story is told that is somewhat outside of this lament is Mack's best friend, Davis, a successful producer whose movies, as per his want, must have the "money shot" of the proverbial and literal head exploding in whatever violent action.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Grand Canyon (1991) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Empathy 30%, Sadness 25%, Anger 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Empathy, Sadness, Anger. Genres: Drama, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Empathy, Sadness and Anger. Its IMDb rating of 6.8/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 70/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Empathy
- Love
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Empathy | Love |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Tension | 42 % | 38 % | 12 % | 3 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 10′ | Tension | 57 % | 56 % | 21 % | 6 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Tension | 63 % | 63 % | 27 % | 10 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Tension | 56 % | 51 % | 31 % | 20 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Love | 53 % | 39 % | 41 % | 30 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Sadness | 50 % | 27 % | 44 % | 31 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Love | 46 % | 25 % | 38 % | 29 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Empathy | 51 % | 41 % | 39 % | 23 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Tension | 58 % | 49 % | 41 % | 21 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Hope | 50 % | 33 % | 35 % | 26 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Empathy | 42 % | 25 % | 34 % | 24 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Empathy | 42 % | 29 % | 36 % | 19 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Hope | 42 % | 30 % | 34 % | 20 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Tension | 44 % | 32 % | 34 % | 24 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 97′ | Hope | 49 % | 36 % | 37 % | 26 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 104′ | Tension | 58 % | 49 % | 44 % | 19 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 111′ | Tension | 63 % | 59 % | 47 % | 16 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 117′ | Tension | 60 % | 49 % | 44 % | 27 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 124′ | Love | 56 % | 28 % | 37 % | 41 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 131′ | Hope | 54 % | 12 % | 32 % | 43 % |
Rags to riches
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Otis
The Alley Baron
Kelley
Claire's Baby
Claire's Baby
Rocstar
Jimmy
Rotor
Eddie
Details
- Directed by
- Lawrence Kasdan
- Written by
- Lawrence Kasdan, Meg Kasdan, Meg Kasdan
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1991
- Runtime
- 134 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Empathy
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





