Jungle Fever
1991 · 132 min · Director: Spike Lee
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A successful and married black man contemplates having an affair with a white girl from work. He's quite rightly worried that the racial difference would make an already taboo relationship even worse.
Emotional fingerprint
Jungle Fever (1991) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anxiety 30%, Empathy 25%, Sadness 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Anxiety, Empathy, Sadness. Genres: Drama, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Anxiety, Empathy and Sadness. Its IMDb rating of 6.6/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 68/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Sadness
- Disturbing
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Sadness | Disturbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Love | 47 % | 13 % | 4 % | 10 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 10′ | Love | 38 % | 18 % | 5 % | 12 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Humor | 36 % | 25 % | 13 % | 18 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Sadness | 41 % | 30 % | 21 % | 20 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Love | 45 % | 35 % | 19 % | 22 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Disturbing | 47 % | 40 % | 18 % | 28 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Tension | 51 % | 45 % | 20 % | 31 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Tension | 55 % | 50 % | 25 % | 38 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Tension | 60 % | 54 % | 35 % | 44 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Tension | 62 % | 55 % | 36 % | 49 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Disturbing | 66 % | 59 % | 39 % | 59 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Disturbing | 63 % | 56 % | 36 % | 57 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Tension | 53 % | 46 % | 30 % | 45 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 89′ | Sadness | 57 % | 50 % | 33 % | 49 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 96′ | Disturbing | 66 % | 56 % | 39 % | 56 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 102′ | Sadness | 70 % | 57 % | 49 % | 56 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 109′ | Tension | 76 % | 66 % | 56 % | 63 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 116′ | Sadness | 82 % | 75 % | 66 % | 71 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 122′ | Sadness | 87 % | 80 % | 78 % | 78 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 129′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Vera
Ming
Charlie Tucci
Details
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
