Trancers II
1991 · 85 min · Director: Charles Band, Charles Band
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
It is Los Angeles, 1991. Jack Deth has become accustomed to life with his new wife, Lena, in the six years since they singed Whistler. Hap Ashby, a former pitcher for the California Angels, had gotten his life out of the gutter and made quite a fortune investing, which he uses to finance his collection of fire trucks, among other things. But life is about to become a little more difficult for Jack and the gang. Whistler's brother, E.D. Wardo, has gome back in time and has started a trancer farm under the organization known as GreenWorld. GreenWorld strives to 'clean up the world', but in reality they are kidnapping homeless people and mental patients to become 'tranced'. And they're after Hap, the ancestor of a future Council Member. Jack's quite ready to singe a few trancers, but he isn't expecting his dead wife to show up. Through the power of technology, Alice has been saved from death and sent back to 1991 to help Jack and stop Wardo. The tension mounts as Lena becomes more distraught by the thought of Jack leaving her for another woman, Hap slips back into his alcoholic habits to deal with the stress, and Jack realizes that when Alice returns to the future, she'll die the next day. But somehow, Jack'll find a way to fix everything. He always does.
Emotional fingerprint
Trancers II (1991) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Excitement 30%, Tension 25%, Fear 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Excitement30%
- Tension25%
- Fear20%
- Curiosity15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Excitement, Tension, Fear. Genres: Action, Horror, Sci-Fi. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Excitement, Tension and Fear. Its IMDb rating of 5.4/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 59/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Humor
- Curiosity
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Humor | Curiosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Curiosity | 43 % | 17 % | 12 % | 48 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 6′ | Curiosity | 46 % | 24 % | 20 % | 45 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Humor | 46 % | 35 % | 28 % | 39 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Curiosity | 48 % | 44 % | 20 % | 38 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Tension | 54 % | 45 % | 18 % | 41 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Curiosity | 58 % | 38 % | 27 % | 52 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Tension | 53 % | 52 % | 32 % | 42 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Tension | 56 % | 49 % | 35 % | 40 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Humor | 59 % | 43 % | 49 % | 30 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Humor | 60 % | 39 % | 54 % | 19 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Sadness | 57 % | 39 % | 46 % | 18 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Humor | 54 % | 41 % | 44 % | 21 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Humor | 53 % | 43 % | 41 % | 24 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Tension | 55 % | 49 % | 34 % | 30 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Tension | 64 % | 63 % | 26 % | 33 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Tension | 76 % | 76 % | 18 % | 24 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Tension | 83 % | 83 % | 13 % | 21 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 79′ | Tension | 80 % | 74 % | 14 % | 28 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Relief | 77 % | 60 % | 15 % | 28 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Trancers II. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Hap Ashby
McNulty
Shovel Man
Ramon
Curly
Deli Man
Real Estate Agent
Details
- Directed by
- Charles Band, Charles Band
- Written by
- Charles Band, Danny Bilson, Jack Canson, Jackson Barr
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1991
- Runtime
- 85 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Excitement
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Data: JustWatch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
