1492: Conquest of Paradise
1992 · 154 min · Director: Ridley Scott
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Big budget account of Christopher Columbus' discovery of the Americas. Released in 1992 to celebrate the 500th anniversary of the discovery. Shows the disastrous effects the Europeans had on the original inhabitants, and Columbus' struggle to civilize the New World.
Emotional fingerprint
1492: Conquest of Paradise (1992) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Awe 30%, Anxiety 25%, Empathy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Awe30%
- Anxiety25%
- Empathy20%
- Melancholy15%
- Surprise10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Awe, Anxiety, Empathy. Genres: Drama, Adventure, Biography. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Awe, Anxiety and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 6.4/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 67/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Hope
- Tension
- Disturbing
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Hope | Tension | Disturbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 4′ | Curiosity | 52 % | 30 % | 29 % | 20 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Tension | 51 % | 26 % | 38 % | 22 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Curiosity | 47 % | 31 % | 40 % | 11 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Hope | 49 % | 38 % | 43 % | 5 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Tension | 59 % | 33 % | 55 % | 11 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Tension | 66 % | 35 % | 54 % | 11 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Hope | 65 % | 50 % | 34 % | 8 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Hope | 61 % | 48 % | 29 % | 13 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Sadness | 55 % | 31 % | 38 % | 18 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Hope | 47 % | 30 % | 38 % | 14 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Hope | 54 % | 31 % | 46 % | 24 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 89′ | Tension | 65 % | 30 % | 54 % | 39 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 96′ | Hope | 67 % | 30 % | 49 % | 43 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 104′ | Disturbing | 72 % | 20 % | 57 % | 57 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 112′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 119′ | Sadness | 67 % | 8 % | 52 % | 48 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 127′ | Disturbing | 66 % | 16 % | 48 % | 45 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 135′ | Sadness | 63 % | 33 % | 31 % | 23 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 142′ | Sadness | 63 % | 38 % | 17 % | 7 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 150′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
King Ferdinand
Hernando de Talavera
Alonso de Bolaños
Details
- Directed by
- Ridley Scott
- Written by
- Rose Bosch, Roselyne Bosch
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1992
- Runtime
- 154 min
- Country
- United Kingdom, France, Spain
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Awe
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
