Honey, I Blew Up the Kid
1992 · 89 min · Director: Randal Kleiser
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Wayne Szalinski is at it again. But instead of shrinking things, he tries to make a machine that can make things grow. As in the first one, his machine isn't quite accurate. But when he brings Nick & his toddler son Adam to see his invention, the machine unexpectedly starts working. And when Adam comes right up to the machine, he gets zapped along with his stuffed bunny. Now, whenever Adam comes near anything electrical, the electricity causes him to grow. Adam soon starts to grow to the height of over 100 feet. And he is now walking through Las Vegas which he thinks is one big play land.
Emotional fingerprint
Honey, I Blew Up the Kid (1992) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Surprise 25%, Excitement 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor35%
- Surprise25%
- Excitement20%
- Anxiety10%
- Relief10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Surprise, Excitement. Genres: Comedy, Adventure, Family. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Surprise and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 4.9/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 56/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Humor
- Love
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Humor | Love |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 37 % | 12 % | 32 % | 20 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Curiosity | 39 % | 18 % | 30 % | 16 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Humor | 44 % | 26 % | 29 % | 16 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Tension | 50 % | 34 % | 31 % | 16 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Humor | 50 % | 33 % | 39 % | 14 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Humor | 49 % | 35 % | 43 % | 14 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Humor | 53 % | 39 % | 46 % | 18 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Humor | 53 % | 36 % | 45 % | 16 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Curiosity | 50 % | 37 % | 39 % | 10 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Humor | 54 % | 45 % | 39 % | 11 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Tension | 57 % | 51 % | 34 % | 16 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Tension | 59 % | 55 % | 26 % | 20 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Tension | 63 % | 61 % | 29 % | 21 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Tension | 66 % | 66 % | 31 % | 15 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Tension | 71 % | 70 % | 25 % | 18 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Tension | 77 % | 74 % | 21 % | 30 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Tension | 78 % | 66 % | 24 % | 41 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Relief | 66 % | 40 % | 28 % | 48 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Humor | 53 % | 17 % | 33 % | 42 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Nick Szalinski
Adam Szalinski
Adam Szalinski
Amy Szalinski
Constance Winters
Nosey Neighbor
Lab Technician
Las Vegas Couple (as Ed Feldman)
Details
- Directed by
- Randal Kleiser
- Written by
- Stuart Gordon, Brian Yuzna, Ed Naha, Garry Goodrow, Peter Elbling, Thom Eberhardt
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1992
- Runtime
- 89 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
