In the Name of the Father
1993 · 133 min · Director: Jim Sheridan
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Young Belfastian Gerry Conlon (Daniel Day-Lewis) admits that he was in London at the time of the incident. He also admits that he is not a model citizen, having committed a petty robbery while in London. He does however profess his innocence when it comes to the bombing of the Guildford Pub in London in 1974, the event which killed several people inside. A self-professed non-political person, he and his three co-accused, dubbed the Guildford Four, are thought to be provisional members of the I.R.A. Their self-professed innocence is despite each having signed a statement of guilt which they claim were signed under duress. Their case includes having provable alibis for the time frame of the bombing. And eventually, Joe McAndrew (Don Baker), a known I.R.A. member, admits to the bombing. Dubbed the Maguire Seven, seven others, primarily members of Gerry's extended family including his father Giuseppe (Pete Postlethwaite), are accused of being accessories to the bombing. Following on the work initiated by Giuseppe, Gerry works on a campaign to prove their collective innocence, this work with the assistance of compassionate lawyer Gareth Peirce (Dame Emma Thompson). As Gareth works on this campaign, she is faced with obstacle after obstacle placed by Robert Dixon (Corin Redgrave), who led the initial investigation and questioning of the four accused on behalf of the Police.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
In the Name of the Father (1993) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Sadness 30%, Empathy 25%, Anger 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Sadness, Empathy, Anger. Genres: Drama, Crime, Biography. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Sadness, Empathy and Anger. Its IMDb rating of 8.1/10 suggests a strong audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 74/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Sadness
- Empathy
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Anger
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Sadness | Empathy | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Tension | 62 % | 15 % | 27 % | 60 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 10′ | Tension | 53 % | 20 % | 30 % | 45 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Sadness | 41 % | 19 % | 24 % | 29 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Tension | 45 % | 18 % | 24 % | 38 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Tension | 63 % | 29 % | 44 % | 61 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Tension | 78 % | 45 % | 65 % | 78 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Tension | 79 % | 57 % | 71 % | 75 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Sadness | 71 % | 55 % | 65 % | 63 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Anger | 73 % | 51 % | 64 % | 65 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Sadness | 75 % | 61 % | 69 % | 66 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Sadness | 61 % | 56 % | 60 % | 46 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Sadness | 54 % | 40 % | 49 % | 40 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Tension | 64 % | 39 % | 51 % | 56 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Tension | 69 % | 45 % | 54 % | 64 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 96′ | Tension | 71 % | 54 % | 59 % | 61 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 103′ | Sadness | 81 % | 73 % | 75 % | 61 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 110′ | Sadness | 86 % | 84 % | 84 % | 61 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 116′ | Sadness | 83 % | 72 % | 79 % | 60 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 123′ | Anger | 84 % | 63 % | 78 % | 55 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 130′ | Relief | 88 % | 65 % | 82 % | 43 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about In the Name of the Father. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about In the Name of the Father — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Sarah Conlon
Paddy Armstrong
Joe McAndrew
IRA Man 1
Soldier
Soldier
Soldier
Details
- Directed by
- Jim Sheridan
- Written by
- Jim Sheridan, Gerry Conlon, Terry George
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1993
- Runtime
- 133 min
- Country
- Ireland, United Kingdom, United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Sadness
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





