Look Who's Talking Now
1993 · 96 min · Director: Tom Ropelewski
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
In this, the third film, it's the pets who do the talking. The Ubriacco's find themselves the owners of two dogs, Rocks, a street wise cross breed, and Daphne, a spoiled pedigree poodle. James has a new job, pilot to the sexy and lonely Samantha. Mollie's just lost hers and is stuck at home.
Emotional fingerprint
Look Who's Talking Now (1993) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Happiness 25%, Surprise 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor35%
- Happiness25%
- Surprise15%
- Love15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Happiness, Surprise. Genres: Comedy, Romance, Family. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Happiness and Surprise. Its IMDb rating of 4.4/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 54/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Love
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Love | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 52 % | 52 % | 22 % | 8 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 48 % | 46 % | 19 % | 11 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Humor | 49 % | 46 % | 18 % | 10 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Humor | 54 % | 53 % | 16 % | 8 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Humor | 53 % | 51 % | 14 % | 14 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 26′ | Humor | 51 % | 49 % | 14 % | 21 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Humor | 56 % | 55 % | 16 % | 19 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Humor | 58 % | 56 % | 18 % | 18 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Humor | 51 % | 48 % | 18 % | 25 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Humor | 48 % | 39 % | 23 % | 31 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Love | 50 % | 38 % | 35 % | 25 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Humor | 54 % | 45 % | 40 % | 15 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Humor | 53 % | 44 % | 33 % | 21 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Sadness | 50 % | 35 % | 23 % | 36 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Tension | 51 % | 35 % | 16 % | 45 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Tension | 60 % | 39 % | 18 % | 55 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 79′ | Tension | 66 % | 36 % | 24 % | 60 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Relief | 64 % | 33 % | 32 % | 55 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 89′ | Relief | 67 % | 35 % | 38 % | 57 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 94′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Sol
Ruthie
Kid at Schoolyard
Kid at Schoolyard
Accountant
Old Waitress
Pimply Faced Kid
Kid on Santa's Lap
Bratty Girl
Details
- Directed by
- Tom Ropelewski
- Written by
- Amy Heckerling, Leslie Dixon, Tom Ropelewski
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1993
- Runtime
- 96 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
