feeldb

Rookie of the Year

1993 · 103 min · Director: Daniel Stern ★ IMDb 6.1 · 34,619 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

12-year-old Henry Rowengartner, whose late father was a minor league baseball player, grew up dreaming of playing baseball, despite his physical shortcomings. Although he's close to his mother Mary, Henry hates Mary's latest boyfriend, Jack Bradfield. After Henry's arm is broken while trying to catch a baseball at school, the tendon in that arm heals too tightly, allowing Henry to throw pitches that are as fast as 103 mph. Henry is spotted at nearby Wrigley Field by Larry "Fish" Fisher, the general manager of the struggling Chicago Cubs, after Henry throws an opponent's home-run ball all the way from the outfield bleachers back to the catcher, and it seems that Henry may be the pitcher that team owner Bob Carson has been praying for. At first, Cubs manager Sal Martinella doesn't like Henry being on the team, but despite the rawness of his talent, Henry revives everyone's team spirit and reignites the enthusiasm of the fans. While money hungry Jack pulls strings behind the scenes to line his own pockets, Mary starts to fall for veteran pitcher Chet "Rocket" Steadman, whose injuries are curtailing a once sparkling career. While Henry bonds with Chet, Henry's friends resent Henry's star status when he arrives late to help them work on an old boat. As the Cubs head for the National League Championship series, Jack agrees to hand over Henry's contract to the New York Yankees for 25 million dollars. Mary doesn't like that, so when Jack angers Mary even more by stupidly saying that Henry is half his, Mary literally punches Jack out the door, with Henry cheering her on. Thinking about the idea of retiring, both Henry and Chet start performing badly, but they set out to redeem themselves at the National League championship series.

Trailer for Rookie of the Year

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Rookie of the Year (1993) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Joy 35%, Humor 25%, Excitement 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

35%Joy
25%Humor
  1. Joy35%
  2. Humor25%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Joy, Humor, Excitement. Genres: Comedy, Fantasy, Family. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Joy, Humor and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 6.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 64/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Excitement
  • Joy
  • Tension

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Excitement

Dominant emotion: Joy

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Excitement
Joy
Tension
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then rises around 78 %, then peaks around 98 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityExcitementJoyTension
2.5 %≈ 3′Humor40 %23 %18 %15 %
7.5 %≈ 8′Humor41 %24 %16 %18 %
12.5 %≈ 13′Humor45 %31 %19 %23 %
17.5 %≈ 18′Humor49 %41 %28 %25 %
22.5 %≈ 23′Excitement51 %46 %33 %29 %
27.5 %≈ 28′Excitement55 %50 %30 %40 %
32.5 %≈ 33′Excitement55 %46 %29 %41 %
37.5 %≈ 39′Humor51 %39 %35 %31 %
42.5 %≈ 44′Excitement50 %38 %41 %26 %
47.5 %≈ 49′Joy51 %39 %41 %25 %
52.5 %≈ 54′Excitement57 %48 %45 %29 %
57.5 %≈ 59′Joy61 %48 %48 %34 %
62.5 %≈ 64′Tension61 %28 %34 %41 %
67.5 %≈ 70′Sadness63 %19 %26 %45 %
72.5 %≈ 75′Joy64 %38 %34 %48 %
77.5 %≈ 80′Excitement71 %60 %43 %57 %
82.5 %≈ 85′Excitement79 %64 %46 %64 %
87.5 %≈ 90′Tension81 %59 %36 %73 %
92.5 %≈ 95′Tension85 %64 %44 %63 %
97.5 %≈ 100′Joy88 %72 %70 %32 %
Cinderella

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

AM
Amy Morton

Mary Rowengartner

Dan Hedaya

Larry 'Fish' Fisher

Bruce Altman

Jack Bradfield

EB
Eddie Bracken

Bob Carson

RH
Robert Hy Gorman

Clark (as Robert Gorman)

PL
Patrick LaBrecque

George

Daniel Stern

Phil Brickma

TM
Tom Milanovich

Heddo

AB
Andy Berman

Ernie

Neil Flynn

Stan Okie

W. Earl Brown

Billy Frick

Ian Gomez

Odd Bellman

John Candy

Cliff Murdoch - Announcer (uncredited)

TA
Tyler Ann Carroll

Edith

RL
Ross Lehman

Dr. Kersten

JG
John Gegenhuber

Derkin

Details

Directed by
Daniel Stern
Type
Movies
Released
1993
Runtime
103 min
Country
United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.1 · 34,619 ratings
Feels mostly
Joy
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.