Six Degrees of Separation
1993 · 112 min · Director: Fred Schepisi
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
New Yorkers Louisa "Ouisa" Kittredge (Stockard Channing) and John Flanders "Flan" Kittredge (Donald Sutherland) are upper-class private art dealers, pretentious, but compassionate. Their prized possession is a double-sided Kandinsky: one side represents control; the other, chaos. They relay a story to their friends and acquaintances that becomes legendary over time: their encounter with a young black stranger who came stumbling upon their front door one evening as they were courting Geoffrey Miller (Sir Ian McKellen), an important investor who could make them wealthy beyond their dreams. The young man, Paul Poitier (Will Smith), had just arrived in the city when he was mugged outside their building, he sported a minor knife wound to the abdomen. He was a friend of the Kittredges' children, who are attending Harvard; more importantly, he's the son of actor and Director Sidney Poitier. Tomorrow, Paul is meeting up with his father, who is in town directing a movie of "Cats". Beyond the attraction of talking Paul into getting them roles in the movie, Ouisa, Flan, and Geoffrey all end up being captivated by Paul's charm, charisma, pedigree, and eloquence. After tending to his wounds, the Kittredges invite him to stay the night. Their encounter with him ends up being an all-too-familiar story that leads them on a search for him after he leaves their house the next morning. In that search, Ouisa in particularly starts to critically study their lives and how much compassion they actually have.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Six Degrees of Separation (1993) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Confusion 30%, Curiosity 24%, Humor 18%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Confusion, Curiosity, Humor. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Mystery. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Confusion, Curiosity and Humor. Its IMDb rating of 6.7/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 68/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Curiosity
- Empathy
- Sadness
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Curiosity | Empathy | Sadness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Tension | 54 % | 37 % | 20 % | 5 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Curiosity | 49 % | 40 % | 21 % | 6 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Curiosity | 42 % | 41 % | 18 % | 9 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Curiosity | 38 % | 39 % | 16 % | 10 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Curiosity | 37 % | 38 % | 18 % | 10 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Curiosity | 40 % | 34 % | 20 % | 10 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Curiosity | 48 % | 33 % | 20 % | 9 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Tension | 56 % | 43 % | 15 % | 6 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 51 % | 16 % | 10 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Curiosity | 53 % | 51 % | 20 % | 16 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Curiosity | 53 % | 53 % | 19 % | 14 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Curiosity | 50 % | 54 % | 18 % | 9 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Curiosity | 44 % | 48 % | 18 % | 6 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Curiosity | 43 % | 40 % | 21 % | 8 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Curiosity | 52 % | 36 % | 33 % | 25 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Sadness | 63 % | 36 % | 46 % | 46 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Empathy | 64 % | 38 % | 56 % | 46 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Empathy | 67 % | 38 % | 63 % | 48 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 104′ | Sadness | 74 % | 38 % | 65 % | 60 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 109′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Police Officer
Hustler
Connie
Sandy
Carter
Polly
Details
- Directed by
- Fred Schepisi
- Written by
- John Guare
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1993
- Runtime
- 112 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Confusion
- Data updated
Where to watch
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





