Angels in the Outfield
1994 · 103 min · Director: William Dear, William Dear
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Roger, who has lost his mother, is living separated from his father. As he and his friend J.P. are fans of the California Angels baseball team, he has got only two dreams: living together with a real family and seeing the Angels winning the Pennant.
Emotional fingerprint
Angels in the Outfield (1994) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Hope 30%, Empathy 25%, Sadness 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Hope30%
- Empathy25%
- Sadness20%
- Excitement15%
- Relief10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Hope, Empathy, Sadness. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Family. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Hope, Empathy and Sadness. Its IMDb rating of 6.3/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 65/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Joy
- Hope
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Joy | Hope | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Sadness | 62 % | 12 % | 25 % | 27 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Humor | 55 % | 9 % | 18 % | 26 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Humor | 49 % | 9 % | 25 % | 24 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Hope | 53 % | 20 % | 40 % | 26 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Joy | 61 % | 44 % | 46 % | 26 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Joy | 60 % | 49 % | 45 % | 18 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Humor | 54 % | 31 % | 38 % | 14 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Humor | 54 % | 28 % | 31 % | 21 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Humor | 53 % | 35 % | 34 % | 26 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Hope | 55 % | 44 % | 46 % | 24 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Hope | 64 % | 56 % | 56 % | 25 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Joy | 71 % | 49 % | 45 % | 29 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Sadness | 76 % | 21 % | 26 % | 35 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Sadness | 71 % | 11 % | 30 % | 43 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Hope | 65 % | 24 % | 49 % | 51 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Hope | 70 % | 34 % | 55 % | 64 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 85′ | Tension | 80 % | 29 % | 53 % | 76 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Tension | 88 % | 39 % | 56 % | 77 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Joy | 90 % | 71 % | 64 % | 54 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 100′ | Joy | 90 % | 87 % | 70 % | 28 % |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
J.P.
Wally
Jose Martinez
Pablo Garcia
Carolyn
Details
- Directed by
- William Dear, William Dear
- Written by
- Dorothy Kingsley, George Wells, Richard Conlin, Holly Goldberg Sloan
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1994
- Runtime
- 103 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Hope
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
