Guarding Tess
1994 · 96 min · Director: Hugh Wilson
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Doug is a Secret Service Agent who has just completed his stint in charge protecting Tess Carlisle, widow of a former U.S. President, and close personal friend of the President. He finds that she has requested that he not be rotated but instead return to be her permanent detail. Doug is crushed. He wants off her detail. She is very difficult to guard and makes her detail crazy with her whims and demands. Doug returns with no idea of how to continue dealing with her.
Emotional fingerprint
Guarding Tess (1994) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Empathy 25%, Love 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor35%
- Empathy25%
- Love15%
- Excitement15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Empathy, Love. Genres: Comedy, Drama. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Empathy and Love. Its IMDb rating of 6.2/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 64/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Relief
- Empathy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Relief | Empathy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | 21 % | 5 % | 2 % | 12 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 32 % | 13 % | 1 % | 15 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Humor | 43 % | 20 % | 1 % | 19 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Humor | 49 % | 22 % | 3 % | 16 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Humor | 50 % | 20 % | 4 % | 12 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 26′ | Humor | 48 % | 21 % | 4 % | 15 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Humor | 44 % | 28 % | 4 % | 25 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Humor | 46 % | 33 % | 4 % | 29 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Humor | 46 % | 31 % | 4 % | 26 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Empathy | 39 % | 21 % | 4 % | 28 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Sadness | 41 % | 11 % | 5 % | 37 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Empathy | 45 % | 8 % | 7 % | 42 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Empathy | 45 % | 18 % | 5 % | 40 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Tension | 52 % | 42 % | 1 % | 37 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Tension | 65 % | 63 % | 0 % | 40 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Tension | 76 % | 75 % | 1 % | 41 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 79′ | Tension | 86 % | 85 % | 10 % | 41 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Tension | 89 % | 72 % | 38 % | 51 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 89′ | Relief | 85 % | 42 % | 65 % | 57 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 94′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Joe Spector
Jimmy
Barbara
Caleb Harrison
Derrick Hastings
Details
- Directed by
- Hugh Wilson
- Written by
- PJ Torokvei, Hugh Wilson
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1994
- Runtime
- 96 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
