feeldb

I Love Trouble

1994 · 123 min · Director: Charles Shyer, Charles Shyer ★ IMDb 5.4 · 13,393 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Veteran reporter Peter Brackett is enjoying new found fame after his book, "White Lies" is published. When he is asked by his newspaper "The Chicago Chronicle" to report on a train crash, he notices new reporter Sabrina Peterson. Brackett's complacency gets rudely shocked by Peterson's report for the rival "Chicago Globe." What follows next is a mad race between the reporters who then cook up possible events that lead up to the crash. After an initial spate of mad reporting, both settle down to get the facts straight, which leads them to uncover opposing information. When each gets setup to be killed at the same place, they escape, and then agree to work together. While they initially do not trust one another, they eventually come to work together to uncover the truth behind the train crash.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for I Love Trouble

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

I Love Trouble (1994) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Excitement 25%, Tension 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Humor30%
  2. Love10%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Excitement, Tension. Genres: Comedy, Romance, Action. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Excitement and Tension. Its IMDb rating of 5.4/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 57/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Tension
  • Curiosity
  • Humor

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Relief

Dominant emotion: Love

Tension
Curiosity
Humor
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 8 %, then rises around 83 %, then peaks around 93 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityTensionCuriosityHumor
2.5 %≈ 3′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
7.5 %≈ 9′Curiosity36 %19 %34 %25 %
12.5 %≈ 15′Curiosity38 %18 %36 %28 %
17.5 %≈ 22′Humor40 %18 %35 %34 %
22.5 %≈ 28′Humor43 %24 %39 %32 %
27.5 %≈ 34′Curiosity52 %40 %43 %24 %
32.5 %≈ 40′Tension56 %51 %38 %27 %
37.5 %≈ 46′Relief53 %45 %39 %31 %
42.5 %≈ 52′Curiosity50 %37 %46 %30 %
47.5 %≈ 58′Curiosity52 %39 %51 %30 %
52.5 %≈ 65′Curiosity54 %36 %45 %32 %
57.5 %≈ 71′Humor54 %31 %36 %39 %
62.5 %≈ 77′Tension55 %36 %37 %43 %
67.5 %≈ 83′Humor57 %33 %32 %46 %
72.5 %≈ 89′Love55 %27 %28 %36 %
77.5 %≈ 95′Love52 %32 %35 %19 %
82.5 %≈ 101′Tension55 %47 %43 %13 %
87.5 %≈ 108′Tension69 %66 %41 %21 %
92.5 %≈ 114′Tension77 %57 %26 %36 %
97.5 %≈ 120′Love75 %30 %14 %44 %
Rags to riches

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about I Love Trouble. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about I Love Trouble — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Nick Nolte

Peter Brackett

Saul Rubinek

Sam Smotherman

James Rebhorn

The Thin Man

Robert Loggia

Matt Greenfield

MM
Marsha Mason

Senator Gayle Robbins

Eugene Levy

Justice of the Peace

Charles Martin Smith

Rick Medwick

Dan Butler

Wilson Chess

Paul Gleason

Kenny Bacon

Jane Adams

Evans

LL
Lisa Lu

Virgina Hervey

Nora Dunn

Lindy

HM
Hallie Meyers-Shyer

Little Girl in Barn

BD
Boone David Cates

Little Boy in Barn

RB
Richard Brown

Minister

Clark Gregg

Darryl Beekman, Jr.

Details

Type
Movies
Released
1994
Runtime
123 min
Country
United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 5.4 · 13,393 ratings
Feels mostly
Humor
Data updated

Where to watch

Also on

Availability varies by country

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.