feeldb

Speechless

1994 · 99 min · Director: Ron Underwood ★ IMDb 5.8 · 5,676 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Meeting each other for the first time in the gift shop of the Las Cruces, New Mexico hotel where they are both staying, there is an undeniable and mutual attraction between Julia Mann and Kevin Vallick, with things they share being their insomnia and both being writers. That attraction may take a turn when they find out at an inopportune time that he is now not the television sitcom writer she believed him to be and she is now not the reporter he believed her to be, but rather they are both speechwriters for opposing candidates for the one open New Mexico senate seat, she writing for Democrat Lloyd Wannamaker, and he writing for Republican Ray Garvin. Beyond issues within their respective campaigns they may have let slip in their pillow talk, they have to decide if love and politics can mix. Their situation is further complicated by: Julia's ex-fiancé, war correspondent Robert Freed - nicknamed Baghdad Bob - trying to win her back, she who broke up with him believing he wanted a cheering section more than a wife; Kevin's unique relationship with cutthroat Annette, who hired him to work on Garvin's campaign; some not so little political impropriety which the other side would love to use to smear their opponent; and a few misunderstandings about the balance between their professional and personal lives.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Speechless

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Speechless (1994) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Love 25%, Excitement 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

30%Humor
25%Love
  1. Humor30%
  2. Love25%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Love, Excitement. Genres: Comedy, Romance. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Love and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 5.8/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 60/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Love
  • Humor
  • Tension

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Love

Dominant emotion: Tension

Love
Humor
Tension
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then peaks around 98 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityLoveHumorTension
2.5 %≈ 2′Humor33 %15 %33 %8 %
7.5 %≈ 7′Humor41 %28 %39 %10 %
12.5 %≈ 12′Love46 %36 %40 %11 %
17.5 %≈ 17′Humor40 %25 %35 %16 %
22.5 %≈ 22′Humor40 %13 %38 %26 %
27.5 %≈ 27′Humor45 %10 %41 %35 %
32.5 %≈ 32′Humor43 %10 %39 %33 %
37.5 %≈ 37′Humor44 %11 %43 %30 %
42.5 %≈ 42′Humor49 %21 %46 %31 %
47.5 %≈ 47′Love49 %36 %41 %28 %
52.5 %≈ 52′Love48 %35 %40 %25 %
57.5 %≈ 57′Humor48 %26 %41 %26 %
62.5 %≈ 62′Love51 %38 %34 %32 %
67.5 %≈ 67′Love59 %54 %31 %40 %
72.5 %≈ 72′Love61 %54 %44 %39 %
77.5 %≈ 77′Humor61 %39 %50 %39 %
82.5 %≈ 82′Tension63 %19 %35 %50 %
87.5 %≈ 87′Tension65 %26 %24 %51 %
92.5 %≈ 92′Love71 %57 %33 %33 %
97.5 %≈ 97′Love75 %73 %40 %15 %
Man in a hole

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Speechless. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Speechless — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Ernie Hudson

Ventura

Gailard Sartain

Lee Cutler

Ray Baker

Ray Garvin

Mitchell Ryan

Lloyd Wannamaker

Paul Lazar

Harry

RP
Richard Poe

Tom

JC
Jodi Carlisle

Doris Wind

CM
Cynthia Mace

Michelle Kortz

Mary Pat Gleason

Desk Clerk

Jon Favreau

Debate Control Room Operator (uncredited)

KK
Khris Kaneff

Party Guest (uncredited)

Richard Schiff

Sound Technician (uncredited)

Details

Directed by
Ron Underwood
Written by
Robert King
Type
Movies
Released
1994
Runtime
99 min
Country
United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 5.8 · 5,676 ratings
Feels mostly
Humor
Data updated

Where to watch

Also on

Availability varies by country

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.