Swimming with Sharks
1994 · 93 min · Director: George Huang
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A young Hollywood executive becomes the assistant to a big time movie producer who is the worst boss imaginable: abusive, abrasive and cruel. But soon things turn around when the young executive kidnaps his boss and visits all the cruelties back on him.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Swimming with Sharks (1994) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anger 30%, Humor 25%, Tension 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Anger30%
- Humor25%
- Tension20%
- Excitement15%
- Anxiety10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Anger, Humor, Tension. Genres: Comedy, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Anger, Humor and Tension. Its IMDb rating of 7.0/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 71/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Disturbing
- Sympathy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sympathy
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Disturbing | Sympathy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 38 % | 32 % | 15 % | 17 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Tension | 48 % | 45 % | 24 % | 19 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Tension | 50 % | 49 % | 30 % | 25 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Sympathy | 50 % | 46 % | 33 % | 38 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Sympathy | 55 % | 50 % | 39 % | 45 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 26′ | Tension | 55 % | 49 % | 40 % | 45 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Sympathy | 51 % | 43 % | 36 % | 46 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Sympathy | 46 % | 38 % | 30 % | 41 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Sympathy | 50 % | 43 % | 35 % | 35 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Disturbing | 69 % | 59 % | 60 % | 40 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Disturbing | 74 % | 63 % | 66 % | 41 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Tension | 59 % | 50 % | 46 % | 33 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Tension | 49 % | 36 % | 30 % | 30 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Sympathy | 55 % | 29 % | 29 % | 43 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Sadness | 65 % | 34 % | 38 % | 49 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 72′ | Tension | 61 % | 44 % | 38 % | 39 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Sympathy | 61 % | 55 % | 40 % | 38 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Tension | 78 % | 73 % | 61 % | 44 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Tension | 73 % | 66 % | 63 % | 36 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Humor | 47 % | 38 % | 40 % | 22 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Details
- Directed by
- George Huang
- Written by
- George Huang
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1994
- Runtime
- 93 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Anger
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Also on
Availability varies by country
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





