feeldb

Irma Vep

1996 · 99 min · Director: Olivier Assayas ★ IMDb 7 · 10,900 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

French filmmaker René Vidal was once a renowned director, but most see his career on a quick downward slide based on his last several films. In Paris, he is just starting to film his latest movie, a remake of Les vampires (1915), and has hired Hong Kong based Chinese actress Maggie Cheung as the title lead, "Irma Vep" (an anagram for "vampire"), despite she knowing no French and she not being an obvious choice to most. Maggie has never worked with Vidal before and knows little about his movies, but many of his primarily French crew are part of his regular stable. As such, Maggie may become isolated among the cast and crew, unless there are those who bring her into their English conversations, they who may have somewhat ulterior motives in doing so. There are also factions within the cast and crew, who, based on their history, have a poisoned sense of what is going on. With Vidal, he is dealing with some personal issues while he tries to regain his film making form. He may transfer his thoughts of Irma Vep to Maggie, who he hired because he too sees her as strong and sexy like the skin-tight latex clad Irma. And Maggie may take her research for the comic bookish character to an extreme.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Irma Vep

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Irma Vep (1996) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Curiosity 25%, Confusion 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Humor30%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Curiosity, Confusion. Genres: Comedy, Drama. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Curiosity and Confusion. Its IMDb rating of 7.0/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 70/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Humor
  • Curiosity
  • Sympathy

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Sympathy

Dominant emotion: Melancholy

Humor
Curiosity
Sympathy
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Follow the emotional intensity across the film; hatched intervals indicate limited subtitle evidence.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityHumorCuriositySympathy
2.5 %≈ 2′Curiosity38 %27 %40 %15 %
7.5 %≈ 7′Curiosity41 %28 %44 %15 %
12.5 %≈ 12′Humor40 %33 %40 %18 %
17.5 %≈ 17′Humor40 %36 %29 %21 %
22.5 %≈ 22′Humor48 %36 %20 %24 %
27.5 %≈ 27′Tension48 %30 %21 %26 %
32.5 %≈ 32′Curiosity41 %33 %28 %25 %
37.5 %≈ 37′Humor45 %46 %31 %24 %
42.5 %≈ 42′Humor50 %40 %34 %31 %
47.5 %≈ 47′Sympathy50 %16 %36 %41 %
52.5 %≈ 52′Melancholy49 %10 %34 %44 %
57.5 %≈ 57′Melancholy45 %21 %28 %38 %
62.5 %≈ 62′Tension43 %31 %29 %29 %
67.5 %≈ 67′Humor44 %34 %31 %31 %
72.5 %≈ 72′Sympathy43 %28 %30 %38 %
77.5 %≈ 77′Curiosity41 %23 %32 %38 %
82.5 %≈ 82′Sympathy44 %20 %30 %40 %
87.5 %≈ 87′Melancholy43 %16 %27 %34 %
92.5 %≈ 92′Curiosity40 %17 %35 %22 %
97.5 %≈ 97′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Irma Vep. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Irma Vep — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Jean-Pierre Léaud

René Vidal

AB
Antoine Basler

Journalist

Alex Descas

Desormeaux

DF
Dominique Faysse

Maïté

Arsinée Khanjian

L'américaine

BN
Bernard Nissile

Markus

OT
Olivier Torres

Ferdinand / Moreno

BO
Bulle Ogier

Mireille

LC
Lou Castel

José Mirano

JF
Jacques Fieschi

Roland

EL
Estelle Larrivaz

La standardiste

BC
Balthazar Clémenti

Robert - Assistant

LC
Lara Cowez

Script Supervisor

DC
Dominique Cuny

Grip

JD
Jessica Doyle

Jessica - Roland's Friend

SF
Sandra Faure

Vendeuse, sex-shop

CF
Catherine Ferny

Policewoman

Details

Directed by
Olivier Assayas
Written by
Olivier Assayas
Type
Movies
Released
1996
Runtime
99 min
Country
France
Genres
Comedy, Drama
Ratings
★ IMDb 7 · 10,900 ratings
Feels mostly
Humor
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.