feeldb

Kissed

1996 · 78 min · Director: Lynne Stopkewich ★ IMDb 6.4 · 4,222 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Sandra Larson has always been fascinated by the entire sensory experience surrounding death: its touch, smell and look. As a child, she would search out dead animals and perform ritualistic burials. As a young woman, Sandra gets a job at Wallis Funeral Home, first as a general assistant, then progressing to study to become an embalmer. At the funeral home, she begins to take her fascination with death to the next level by becoming a necrophiliac. But she also begins her first ever relationship with Matt, a medical student, with who she is totally open about her necrophilia. He finds this aspect of her compelling. He becomes all consumed with her as she is consumed with dead people. The questions become how far he will take this fascination with her to understand fully what is going through her emotional being, how far she will allow him to go, and how far can her feelings for him extend as a live being.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Kissed

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Kissed (1996) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Disturbing 35%, Confusion 25%, Anxiety 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Love10%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Disturbing, Confusion, Anxiety. Genres: Drama, Romance. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Disturbing, Confusion and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 6.4/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 67/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Disturbing
  • Tension
  • Sadness

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Disturbing

Dominant emotion: Tension

Disturbing
Tension
Sadness
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 63 %, then rises around 78 %, then peaks around 88 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityDisturbingTensionSadness
2.5 %≈ 2′Curiosity50 %32 %13 %15 %
7.5 %≈ 6′Curiosity46 %30 %15 %23 %
12.5 %≈ 10′Sadness46 %32 %20 %29 %
17.5 %≈ 14′Curiosity49 %39 %24 %23 %
22.5 %≈ 18′Disturbing54 %48 %25 %18 %
27.5 %≈ 21′Disturbing59 %55 %23 %14 %
32.5 %≈ 25′Disturbing61 %60 %24 %11 %
37.5 %≈ 29′Disturbing61 %57 %26 %13 %
42.5 %≈ 33′Curiosity60 %51 %24 %10 %
47.5 %≈ 37′Curiosity60 %54 %25 %6 %
52.5 %≈ 41′Disturbing58 %57 %27 %5 %
57.5 %≈ 45′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
62.5 %≈ 49′Curiosity48 %30 %37 %15 %
67.5 %≈ 53′Tension55 %41 %48 %20 %
72.5 %≈ 57′Disturbing63 %53 %59 %23 %
77.5 %≈ 60′Tension69 %57 %66 %25 %
82.5 %≈ 64′Tension80 %69 %77 %38 %
87.5 %≈ 68′Tension89 %79 %75 %60 %
92.5 %≈ 72′Sadness88 %78 %55 %75 %
97.5 %≈ 76′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Kissed. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Kissed — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Molly Parker

Sandra Larson

PO
Peter Outerbridge

Jay Brazeau

Mr. Wallis

NM
Natasha Morley

Young Sandra

JW
Jessie Winter Mudie

Carol

JT
James Timmons

Jan

JM
Joe Maffei

Biology Teacher

RT
Robert Thurston

Detective

AK
Annabel Kershaw

Sandra's Mother

TD
Tim Dixon

Sandra's Father

AW
Amber Warnat

Lisa Brown

BF
Bill Finck

Minister

JC
Janet Craig

Mourner

ED
Edward Davey

Embalming Prof.

HW
Hamish Wilson

Gurney Goner

VB
Valerie Boeke

Cancer Corpse

JR
Jeff Richards

Tony the Torso

NB
Noel Boulanger

Prep Room Demo

DL
Debra L. Huntley

Dead Madonna

JP
John Pozer

Class Carcass

Details

Directed by
Lynne Stopkewich
Written by
Lynne Stopkewich, Angus Fraser, Barbara Gowdy
Type
Movies
Released
1996
Runtime
78 min
Country
Canada
Genres
Drama, Romance
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.4 · 4,222 ratings
Feels mostly
Disturbing
Data updated

Where to watch

Also on

Availability varies by country

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.