12 Angry Men
1997 · 117 min · Director: William Friedkin
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Made for cable television remake of the 1957 classic about twelve jurors quick to condemn a Latino youth on trial for murdering his father before reviewing the evidence. Juror #8 holds out with a verdict of not guilty, thus setting the stage for arguments and reasons why or why not the boy may be guilty.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
12 Angry Men (1997) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Satisfaction 30%, Anxiety 25%, Empathy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Satisfaction30%
- Anxiety25%
- Empathy20%
- Anger15%
- Inspiration10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Satisfaction, Anxiety, Empathy. Genres: Drama, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Satisfaction, Anxiety and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 7.8/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 73/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Curiosity
- Relief
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Curiosity | Relief |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Tension | 47 % | 47 % | 33 % | 0 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Tension | 46 % | 44 % | 35 % | 0 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Curiosity | 52 % | 48 % | 40 % | 0 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Tension | 59 % | 53 % | 46 % | 1 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 26′ | Curiosity | 60 % | 54 % | 53 % | 6 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Tension | 56 % | 53 % | 45 % | 14 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Empathy | 51 % | 46 % | 38 % | 15 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 46 % | 50 % | 10 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Curiosity | 60 % | 51 % | 60 % | 11 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Curiosity | 60 % | 55 % | 60 % | 15 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Curiosity | 65 % | 63 % | 60 % | 14 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Tension | 68 % | 65 % | 51 % | 13 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Tension | 63 % | 60 % | 40 % | 10 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 79′ | Tension | 60 % | 56 % | 45 % | 6 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 85′ | Curiosity | 57 % | 54 % | 55 % | 11 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Curiosity | 65 % | 59 % | 53 % | 18 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 97′ | Tension | 74 % | 64 % | 50 % | 19 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 102′ | Curiosity | 75 % | 64 % | 50 % | 39 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 108′ | Relief | 63 % | 51 % | 31 % | 51 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 114′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | 38 % | 25 % | 12 % | 33 % |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Guard
Details
- Directed by
- William Friedkin
- Written by
- Reginald Rose
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1997
- Runtime
- 117 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Satisfaction
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





