Bulworth
1998 · 108 min · Director: Warren Beatty
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Senator Jay Bulworth is facing speculation-induced financial ruin, so he puts out a contract on his own life in order to collect a large, new insurance policy for his family. Living each moment on borrowed time, he suddenly begins spouting raw, unfiltered--and sometimes offensive in word but satirical in spirit -- thoughts to shocked audiences and handlers in the speech of hip-hop music and culture. His newfound uninhibitedness and new relationship with Nina carry him on a journey of political and spiritual renewal.
Emotional fingerprint
Bulworth (1998) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Surprise 25%, Excitement 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor35%
- Surprise25%
- Excitement15%
- Inspiration15%
- Joy10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Surprise, Excitement. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Surprise and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 6.8/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 70/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Curiosity
- Surprise
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Surprise
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Curiosity | Surprise |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 34 % | 24 % | 34 % | 8 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Curiosity | 37 % | 21 % | 37 % | 14 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Curiosity | 38 % | 20 % | 35 % | 19 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Humor | 40 % | 28 % | 29 % | 22 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Humor | 42 % | 36 % | 29 % | 23 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Curiosity | 42 % | 36 % | 32 % | 20 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Humor | 43 % | 40 % | 30 % | 21 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Humor | 43 % | 43 % | 28 % | 24 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Humor | 40 % | 33 % | 30 % | 20 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Curiosity | 40 % | 28 % | 33 % | 16 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Humor | 42 % | 34 % | 30 % | 18 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Tension | 41 % | 29 % | 30 % | 19 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Curiosity | 45 % | 23 % | 33 % | 21 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Tension | 52 % | 28 % | 31 % | 27 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Humor | 49 % | 38 % | 30 % | 28 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Humor | 52 % | 40 % | 35 % | 34 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 89′ | Empathy | 55 % | 34 % | 42 % | 38 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 29 % | 42 % | 41 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 100′ | Surprise | 56 % | 21 % | 32 % | 42 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 105′ | Empathy | 45 % | 12 % | 21 % | 25 % |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Debate Director
Leroy
Rastaman
Bouncer #2
Carl Jann
Video Reporter #4
Dave Allen Clark
Details
- Directed by
- Warren Beatty
- Written by
- Warren Beatty, Jeremy Pikser
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1998
- Runtime
- 108 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
