Contact
1997 · 150 min · Director: Robert Zemeckis
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Astronomer Dr. Ellie Arroway has long been interested in contact to faraway lands, a love fostered in her childhood by her father, Ted Arroway (David Morse), who died when she was nine-years-old, leaving her orphaned. Her current work in monitoring for extraterrestrial life is based on that love and is in part an homage to her father. Ever since funding from the National Science Foundation (N.S.F.) was pulled on her work, which is referred to some, including her N.S.F. superior David Drumlin (Tom Skerritt), as more science fiction than science, Ellie, with a few of her rogue scientist colleagues, have looked for funding from where ever they could get it to continue their work. When Ellie and her colleagues hear chatter originating from the vicinity of the star Vega, Ellie feels vindicated. But that vindication is short lived when others, including politicians, the military, religious leaders, and other scientists, such as Drumlin, try to take over her work. When the messages received from space are decoded, the project takes on a whole new dimension, which strengthens for Ellie the quest for the truth. Thrown into the mix are the unknown person who has up until now funded most of Ellie's work and what his motivations are, and Palmer Joss (Matthew McConaughey), a renowned author and theologian, who despite their fundamental differences in outlook, is mutually attracted to Ellie, that attraction based in part on intellect and their common goal of wanting to know the truth.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Contact (1997) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Awe 35%, Curiosity 25%, Hope 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Awe, Curiosity, Hope. Genres: Drama, Mystery, Sci-Fi. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Awe, Curiosity and Hope. Its IMDb rating of 7.5/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 74/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Curiosity
- Awe
- Hope
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Awe
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Curiosity | Awe | Hope |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 4′ | Curiosity | 43 % | 45 % | 22 % | 25 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Curiosity | 43 % | 43 % | 19 % | 23 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Sadness | 49 % | 34 % | 16 % | 21 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 26′ | Sadness | 56 % | 29 % | 13 % | 28 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Hope | 61 % | 45 % | 23 % | 38 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Curiosity | 70 % | 69 % | 45 % | 43 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Curiosity | 70 % | 74 % | 50 % | 36 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Curiosity | 64 % | 69 % | 39 % | 30 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Curiosity | 63 % | 66 % | 30 % | 30 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Curiosity | 60 % | 60 % | 30 % | 33 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 79′ | Hope | 58 % | 48 % | 29 % | 34 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Sadness | 63 % | 36 % | 23 % | 26 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 94′ | Tension | 66 % | 38 % | 20 % | 28 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 101′ | Hope | 63 % | 46 % | 21 % | 40 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 109′ | Tension | 68 % | 55 % | 38 % | 40 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 116′ | Awe | 81 % | 63 % | 66 % | 40 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 124′ | Awe | 83 % | 60 % | 65 % | 41 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 131′ | Tension | 73 % | 51 % | 43 % | 40 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 139′ | Hope | 68 % | 47 % | 42 % | 52 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 146′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Contact. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Contact — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Vernon
Davio
Cantina Woman
Ian Broderick
Details
- Directed by
- Robert Zemeckis
- Written by
- James V. Hart, Michael Goldenberg, Carl Sagan
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1997
- Runtime
- 150 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Awe
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





