feeldb

Contact

1997 · 150 min · Director: Robert Zemeckis ★ IMDb 7.5 · 318,138 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Astronomer Dr. Ellie Arroway has long been interested in contact to faraway lands, a love fostered in her childhood by her father, Ted Arroway (David Morse), who died when she was nine-years-old, leaving her orphaned. Her current work in monitoring for extraterrestrial life is based on that love and is in part an homage to her father. Ever since funding from the National Science Foundation (N.S.F.) was pulled on her work, which is referred to some, including her N.S.F. superior David Drumlin (Tom Skerritt), as more science fiction than science, Ellie, with a few of her rogue scientist colleagues, have looked for funding from where ever they could get it to continue their work. When Ellie and her colleagues hear chatter originating from the vicinity of the star Vega, Ellie feels vindicated. But that vindication is short lived when others, including politicians, the military, religious leaders, and other scientists, such as Drumlin, try to take over her work. When the messages received from space are decoded, the project takes on a whole new dimension, which strengthens for Ellie the quest for the truth. Thrown into the mix are the unknown person who has up until now funded most of Ellie's work and what his motivations are, and Palmer Joss (Matthew McConaughey), a renowned author and theologian, who despite their fundamental differences in outlook, is mutually attracted to Ellie, that attraction based in part on intellect and their common goal of wanting to know the truth.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Contact

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Contact (1997) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Awe 35%, Curiosity 25%, Hope 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

35%Awe
20%Hope
  1. Awe35%
  2. Hope20%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Awe, Curiosity, Hope. Genres: Drama, Mystery, Sci-Fi. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Awe, Curiosity and Hope. Its IMDb rating of 7.5/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 74/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Curiosity
  • Awe
  • Hope

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Hope

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Awe

Curiosity
Awe
Hope
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 8 %, then rises around 73 %, then peaks around 83 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityCuriosityAweHope
2.5 %≈ 4′Curiosity43 %45 %22 %25 %
7.5 %≈ 11′Curiosity43 %43 %19 %23 %
12.5 %≈ 19′Sadness49 %34 %16 %21 %
17.5 %≈ 26′Sadness56 %29 %13 %28 %
22.5 %≈ 34′Hope61 %45 %23 %38 %
27.5 %≈ 41′Curiosity70 %69 %45 %43 %
32.5 %≈ 49′Curiosity70 %74 %50 %36 %
37.5 %≈ 56′Curiosity64 %69 %39 %30 %
42.5 %≈ 64′Curiosity63 %66 %30 %30 %
47.5 %≈ 71′Curiosity60 %60 %30 %33 %
52.5 %≈ 79′Hope58 %48 %29 %34 %
57.5 %≈ 86′Sadness63 %36 %23 %26 %
62.5 %≈ 94′Tension66 %38 %20 %28 %
67.5 %≈ 101′Hope63 %46 %21 %40 %
72.5 %≈ 109′Tension68 %55 %38 %40 %
77.5 %≈ 116′Awe81 %63 %66 %40 %
82.5 %≈ 124′Awe83 %60 %65 %41 %
87.5 %≈ 131′Tension73 %51 %43 %40 %
92.5 %≈ 139′Hope68 %47 %42 %52 %
97.5 %≈ 146′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Cinderella

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Contact. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Contact — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

James Woods

Michael Kitz

John Hurt

S. R. Hadden

David Morse

Ted Arroway

Angela Bassett

Rachel Constantine

Max Martini

Willie

Rob Lowe

Richard Rank

Jake Busey

Joseph

TS
Tucker Smallwood

Mission Director

Jena Malone

Young Ellie

SC
Sami Chester

Vernon

TM
Timothy McNeil

Davio

LE
Laura Elena Surillo

Cantina Woman

HS
Henry Strozier

Minister

Larry King

Larry King

TG
Thomas Garner

Ian Broderick

Details

Directed by
Robert Zemeckis
Written by
James V. Hart, Michael Goldenberg, Carl Sagan
Type
Movies
Released
1997
Runtime
150 min
Country
United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 7.5 · 318,138 ratings
Feels mostly
Awe
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.