Red Corner
1997 · 122 min · Director: Jon Avnet
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
American lawyer Jack Moore is in Beijing on what looks to be a successful business trip for his company to enter into a film and television distribution deal with the Chinese government, their main competitor for that distribution deal being HoffCo Telecom out of Germany. Before Jack's boss David McAndrews and the Chinese government sign on the dotted line of the contract, Jack is implicated in a murder, the victim who was discovered in his hotel room. The police were alerted to an incident in his hotel room based on the report of hearing a scream emanating from his room, such a scream which Jack, asleep in the room when the police entered, did not hear. Jack being charged with murder quashes the distribution deal, which instead is awarded to HoffCo. The situation is made all the worse for Jack due to the known connections between the victim and people within high places in China, who may try to manipulate the situation to see Jack sentenced to death for the murder. Jack also has language, cultural and political obstacles to overcome, the Chinese government and thus the court system which seems already to have convicted him to make him, a foreigner, an example. As such, Jack does not trust his court appointed lawyer, a young woman named Shen Yuelin who has always seen her role to carry out Chinese government policy. Things may change when Yuelin begins to believe that Jack is being framed for the murder, the death of an innocent man which she may not be able to tolerate if she has any sway within the Chinese justice system, which she may find she does not. The key to discovering the truth behind the murder, the reason for Jack being framed for it and Jack possibly coming out the other end with his life is an important piece of physical evidence which he knows exists but which seems to be missing.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Red Corner (1997) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anxiety 30%, Tension 25%, Empathy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Anxiety, Tension, Empathy. Genres: Thriller, Drama, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Anxiety, Tension and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 6.3/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 65/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Curiosity
- Empathy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Curiosity | Empathy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 30 % | 12 % | 30 % | 8 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Curiosity | 39 % | 26 % | 34 % | 11 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Tension | 55 % | 51 % | 38 % | 24 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Tension | 65 % | 65 % | 34 % | 38 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Tension | 68 % | 68 % | 32 % | 41 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Tension | 61 % | 61 % | 39 % | 36 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Tension | 55 % | 51 % | 49 % | 29 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 40 % | 51 % | 29 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Relief | 51 % | 31 % | 46 % | 35 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Curiosity | 60 % | 46 % | 51 % | 34 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Tension | 74 % | 70 % | 49 % | 31 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Tension | 73 % | 70 % | 33 % | 40 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Empathy | 68 % | 55 % | 24 % | 56 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Sadness | 68 % | 50 % | 30 % | 61 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Tension | 70 % | 63 % | 43 % | 54 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Tension | 78 % | 78 % | 46 % | 53 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 101′ | Tension | 83 % | 83 % | 54 % | 49 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 107′ | Tension | 80 % | 76 % | 59 % | 43 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 113′ | Relief | 77 % | 67 % | 48 % | 47 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 119′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Gerhardt Hoffman
Hong Ling
General Hong
Procurator Ma
Director Liu's Interpreter
Details
- Directed by
- Jon Avnet
- Written by
- Robert King
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1997
- Runtime
- 122 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Anxiety
- Data updated
Where to watch
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





