Notting Hill
1999 · 124 min · Director: Roger Michell
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Every man's dream comes true for William Thacker, an unsuccessful Notting Hill bookstore owner, when Anna Scott, the world's most beautiful woman and best-liked actress, enters his shop. A little later, he still can't believe it himself, William runs into her again - this time spilling orange juice over her. Anna accepts his offer to change in his nearby apartment, and thanks him with a kiss, which seems to surprise her even more than him. Eventually, Anna and William get to know each other better over the months, but being together with the world's most wanted woman is not easy - neither around your closest friends, nor in front of the all-devouring press.
Emotional fingerprint
Notting Hill (1999) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Love 35%, Humor 25%, Sadness 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Love35%
- Humor25%
- Sadness15%
- Anxiety15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Love, Humor, Sadness. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Love, Humor and Sadness. Its IMDb rating of 7.2/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 72/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Hope
- Love
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Hope | Love |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 37 % | 37 % | 13 % | 10 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Humor | 45 % | 44 % | 15 % | 15 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Humor | 48 % | 45 % | 21 % | 21 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Humor | 45 % | 43 % | 26 % | 23 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Humor | 50 % | 48 % | 30 % | 25 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Humor | 57 % | 54 % | 28 % | 25 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Humor | 59 % | 48 % | 24 % | 28 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Love | 54 % | 38 % | 26 % | 33 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Humor | 50 % | 35 % | 19 % | 25 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Sadness | 51 % | 36 % | 9 % | 16 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Humor | 50 % | 39 % | 14 % | 20 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Love | 49 % | 40 % | 28 % | 33 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Love | 55 % | 36 % | 31 % | 40 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Tension | 59 % | 28 % | 24 % | 35 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Sadness | 53 % | 23 % | 20 % | 26 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 96′ | Sadness | 50 % | 20 % | 20 % | 28 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 102′ | Sadness | 59 % | 21 % | 31 % | 40 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 109′ | Hope | 68 % | 29 % | 53 % | 48 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 115′ | Hope | 70 % | 32 % | 63 % | 47 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 121′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Notting Hill. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Honey
Anna's Publicist
Loud Man in Restaurant
Details
- Directed by
- Roger Michell
- Written by
- Richard Curtis
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1999
- Runtime
- 124 min
- Country
- United Kingdom, United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Love
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
