feeldb

Shakespeare in Love

1998 · 124 min · Director: John Madden ★ IMDb 7.1 · 244,777 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

William Shakespeare (Joseph Fiennes) is a known but struggling poet, playwright, and actor, who not only has sold his next play to both Philip Henslowe (Geoffrey Rush) and Richard Burbage (Martin Clunes), but now faces a far more difficult problem: he is bereft of ideas and has yet to begin writing. He is in search of his muse, the woman who will inspire him but all attempts fail him until he meets the beautiful Viola De Lesseps (Gwyneth Paltrow). She loves the theatre and would like nothing more than to take to the stage, but is forbidden from doing so as only men can be actors. She is also a great admirer of Shakespeare's works. Dressing as a man, and going by the name of "Thomas Kent", she auditions and is ideal for a part in his next play. Shakespeare soon sees through her disguise and they begin a love affair, one they know cannot end happily for them as he is already married and she has been promised to the dour Lord Wessex (Colin Firth). As the company rehearses his new play, William and Viola's love is transferred to the written page leading to the masterpiece that is Romeo and Juliet.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Shakespeare in Love

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Shakespeare in Love (1998) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Love 30%, Humor 22%, Sadness 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

30%Love
22%Humor
  1. Love30%
  2. Humor22%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Love, Humor, Sadness. Genres: Comedy, Drama, History. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Love, Humor and Sadness. Its IMDb rating of 7.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 71/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Love
  • Sadness
  • Tension

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Love

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Hope

Love
Sadness
Tension
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 18 %, then rises around 33 %, then peaks around 93 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityLoveSadnessTension
2.5 %≈ 3′Humor53 %3 %7 %32 %
7.5 %≈ 9′Humor51 %13 %10 %23 %
12.5 %≈ 16′Humor49 %23 %13 %19 %
17.5 %≈ 22′Humor46 %26 %11 %25 %
22.5 %≈ 28′Love48 %29 %10 %35 %
27.5 %≈ 34′Humor53 %31 %16 %41 %
32.5 %≈ 40′Love60 %45 %23 %35 %
37.5 %≈ 47′Love70 %66 %19 %26 %
42.5 %≈ 53′Love73 %71 %23 %33 %
47.5 %≈ 59′Love65 %57 %29 %41 %
52.5 %≈ 65′Humor60 %35 %32 %41 %
57.5 %≈ 71′Sadness66 %30 %51 %44 %
62.5 %≈ 78′Sadness74 %39 %63 %55 %
67.5 %≈ 84′Tension70 %27 %53 %54 %
72.5 %≈ 90′Hope63 %18 %38 %43 %
77.5 %≈ 96′Hope67 %33 %41 %50 %
82.5 %≈ 102′Sadness76 %46 %63 %59 %
87.5 %≈ 109′Sadness78 %51 %70 %46 %
92.5 %≈ 115′Love80 %63 %70 %30 %
97.5 %≈ 121′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Shakespeare in Love. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Shakespeare in Love — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Tom Wilkinson

Hugh Fennyman

Judi Dench

Queen Elizabeth

Colin Firth

Lord Wessex

Ben Affleck

Ned Alleyn

Simon Callow

Tilney

SB
Steven Beard

Makepeace

Jim Carter

Ralph Bashford

Rupert Everett

Christopher Marlowe

MC
Martin Clunes

Richard Burbage

JR
Joe Roberts

John Webster

AS
Antony Sher

Dr. Moth

Georgie Glen

Lady in Waiting

NB
Nicholas Boulton

Henry Condell

BK
Barnaby Kay

Nol

MW
Mark Williams

Wabash

Details

Directed by
John Madden
Type
Movies
Released
1998
Runtime
124 min
Country
United Kingdom, United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 7.1 · 244,777 ratings
Feels mostly
Love
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.