Drop Dead Gorgeous
1999 · 98 min · Director: Michael Patrick Jann
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
In a small Minnesota town, the annual beauty pageant is being covered by a TV crew. Former winner Gladys Leeman wants to make sure her daughter follows in her footsteps. Explosions, falling lights, and trailer fires prove that. As the Leemans are the richest family in town the police are pretty relaxed about it all. Despite everything, main rival (but nice) Amber Atkins won't be stopped. There could well be more death and disappointment to come.
Emotional fingerprint
Drop Dead Gorgeous (1999) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Surprise 20%, Tension 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor35%
- Surprise20%
- Tension20%
- Disturbing15%
- Excitement10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Surprise, Tension. Genres: Thriller, Comedy, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Surprise and Tension. Its IMDb rating of 6.7/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 69/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Joy
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Joy | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 41 % | 38 % | 14 % | 12 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 46 % | 43 % | 14 % | 15 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Humor | 51 % | 46 % | 10 % | 15 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Humor | 50 % | 48 % | 8 % | 13 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Humor | 48 % | 45 % | 7 % | 18 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Humor | 49 % | 43 % | 6 % | 27 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Humor | 54 % | 47 % | 8 % | 31 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Humor | 57 % | 53 % | 12 % | 24 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Humor | 54 % | 51 % | 17 % | 19 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Humor | 50 % | 46 % | 22 % | 22 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Humor | 52 % | 49 % | 20 % | 27 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Humor | 52 % | 48 % | 17 % | 30 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Humor | 50 % | 43 % | 18 % | 34 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Tension | 49 % | 39 % | 19 % | 37 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Sadness | 55 % | 39 % | 16 % | 41 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Tension | 61 % | 44 % | 13 % | 45 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Humor | 58 % | 46 % | 24 % | 35 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Humor | 56 % | 44 % | 35 % | 30 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Joy | 56 % | 37 % | 34 % | 37 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 96′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Michelle Johnson
Tess Weinhaus
Molly Howard
Janelle Betz
Tammy Curry
Jean Kangas, Judge #3
Details
- Directed by
- Michael Patrick Jann
- Written by
- Lona Williams, Lona Williams
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1999
- Runtime
- 98 min
- Country
- United States, Germany
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
