Vidocq
2001 · 98 min · Director: Pitof
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Paris. 1830. In the heart of the town, Vidocq, a famous detective, disappeared as he fights the Alchemist, an assassin that he has been pursuing for a few months. His young biographer, Etienne Boisset, decides to have revenge on Vidocq's death and takes the investigation on...
Emotional fingerprint
Vidocq (2001) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Tension 30%, Awe 25%, Anxiety 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Tension30%
- Awe25%
- Anxiety20%
- Surprise15%
- Excitement10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Tension, Awe, Anxiety. Genres: Fantasy, Crime, Action. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Tension, Awe and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 6.4/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 66/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Curiosity
- Tension
- Disturbing
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Curiosity | Tension | Disturbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Curiosity | 53 % | 53 % | 30 % | 10 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 55 % | 40 % | 19 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Curiosity | 58 % | 58 % | 45 % | 25 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Curiosity | 58 % | 60 % | 41 % | 20 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 57 % | 40 % | 13 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Curiosity | 51 % | 51 % | 38 % | 11 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Curiosity | 52 % | 52 % | 36 % | 15 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Curiosity | 57 % | 54 % | 41 % | 30 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Curiosity | 61 % | 55 % | 47 % | 45 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Curiosity | 64 % | 56 % | 51 % | 51 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Disturbing | 69 % | 57 % | 55 % | 62 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Disturbing | 73 % | 59 % | 58 % | 65 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Curiosity | 66 % | 59 % | 56 % | 51 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Curiosity | 64 % | 54 % | 53 % | 54 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Disturbing | 73 % | 57 % | 60 % | 62 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Tension | 77 % | 63 % | 68 % | 52 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Relief | 50 % | 22 % | 26 % | 7 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 96′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Details
- Directed by
- Pitof
- Written by
- Pitof, Eugène-François Vidocq, Jean-Christophe Grangé
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2001
- Runtime
- 98 min
- Country
- France
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Tension
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
