After Life
1998 · 118 min · Director: Hirokazu Koreeda, Hirokazu Kore-eda
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A small mid-20th century social-service-style office is a waystation for the souls of the recently deceased, where they are processed before entering their personal heaven - a single happy memory re-experienced for eternity. Every Monday, a new group of recently deceased people check in, and the "social workers" in the lodge explain their situation. Once the newly-dead have identified their happiest memories, workers design and replicate each person's chosen memory, which is staged and filmed. At the end of the week, the recently deceased watch the films of their recreated happiest memories in a screening room. As soon as each person sees his or her own memory, he or she vanishes to whatever state of existence lies beyond and takes only that single memory with them. The story pays most attention to two of the "counselors," Takashi (Arata) and Shiori (Oda). Takashi has been assigned to help an old man, Ichiro (played by Naito Taketoshi), select his memory. Reviewing videotape of Ichiro's life, Takashi learns that Ichiro had married Takashi's former fiancée after Takashi had been killed during World War II. Takashi has Ichiro assigned to another counselor, but is still troubled by his memories, causing both him and his quasi-romantic interest Shiori to re-examine their (after-) lives.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
After Life (1998) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Nostalgia 30%, Empathy 25%, Sadness 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Nostalgia30%
- Empathy25%
- Sadness20%
- Awe15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Nostalgia, Empathy, Sadness. Genres: Drama, Fantasy. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Nostalgia, Empathy and Sadness. Its IMDb rating of 7.6/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 73/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Nostalgia
- Empathy
- Love
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Nostalgia
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Nostalgia | Empathy | Love |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 37 % | 15 % | 20 % | 2 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Curiosity | 43 % | 30 % | 28 % | 9 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Nostalgia | 46 % | 45 % | 33 % | 16 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Nostalgia | 40 % | 42 % | 30 % | 14 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Nostalgia | 37 % | 40 % | 30 % | 19 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Nostalgia | 45 % | 48 % | 36 % | 35 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Nostalgia | 49 % | 53 % | 38 % | 34 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Nostalgia | 48 % | 51 % | 38 % | 24 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Nostalgia | 49 % | 49 % | 44 % | 29 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Nostalgia | 54 % | 51 % | 50 % | 42 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Nostalgia | 55 % | 50 % | 46 % | 44 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Curiosity | 43 % | 30 % | 30 % | 24 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Curiosity | 34 % | 18 % | 25 % | 10 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Empathy | 39 % | 29 % | 33 % | 13 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Nostalgia | 48 % | 46 % | 36 % | 20 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Nostalgia | 60 % | 57 % | 48 % | 35 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 97′ | Sadness | 73 % | 56 % | 65 % | 55 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 103′ | Love | 79 % | 53 % | 74 % | 69 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 109′ | Love | 70 % | 46 % | 65 % | 60 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 115′ | Empathy | 53 % | 35 % | 48 % | 38 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Kennosuke Nakamura
Gisuke Shoda
Kana Yoshino
Kenji Yamamoto
Kiyo Nishimura
Young Kyoko Watanabe
Security Guard
Dining Hall Worker
Details
- Directed by
- Hirokazu Koreeda, Hirokazu Kore-eda
- Written by
- Hirokazu Koreeda, Hirokazu Kore-eda
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1998
- Runtime
- 118 min
- Country
- Japan
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Nostalgia
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





