feeldb

After Life

1998 · 118 min · Director: Hirokazu Koreeda, Hirokazu Kore-eda ★ IMDb 7.6 · 16,090 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

A small mid-20th century social-service-style office is a waystation for the souls of the recently deceased, where they are processed before entering their personal heaven - a single happy memory re-experienced for eternity. Every Monday, a new group of recently deceased people check in, and the "social workers" in the lodge explain their situation. Once the newly-dead have identified their happiest memories, workers design and replicate each person's chosen memory, which is staged and filmed. At the end of the week, the recently deceased watch the films of their recreated happiest memories in a screening room. As soon as each person sees his or her own memory, he or she vanishes to whatever state of existence lies beyond and takes only that single memory with them. The story pays most attention to two of the "counselors," Takashi (Arata) and Shiori (Oda). Takashi has been assigned to help an old man, Ichiro (played by Naito Taketoshi), select his memory. Reviewing videotape of Ichiro's life, Takashi learns that Ichiro had married Takashi's former fiancée after Takashi had been killed during World War II. Takashi has Ichiro assigned to another counselor, but is still troubled by his memories, causing both him and his quasi-romantic interest Shiori to re-examine their (after-) lives.

Trailer for After Life

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

After Life (1998) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Nostalgia 30%, Empathy 25%, Sadness 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Awe15%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Nostalgia, Empathy, Sadness. Genres: Drama, Fantasy. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Nostalgia, Empathy and Sadness. Its IMDb rating of 7.6/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 73/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Nostalgia
  • Empathy
  • Love

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Nostalgia

Dominant emotion: Empathy

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Love

Nostalgia
Empathy
Love
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then dips around 63 %, then peaks around 88 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityNostalgiaEmpathyLove
2.5 %≈ 3′Curiosity37 %15 %20 %2 %
7.5 %≈ 9′Curiosity43 %30 %28 %9 %
12.5 %≈ 15′Nostalgia46 %45 %33 %16 %
17.5 %≈ 21′Nostalgia40 %42 %30 %14 %
22.5 %≈ 27′Nostalgia37 %40 %30 %19 %
27.5 %≈ 32′Nostalgia45 %48 %36 %35 %
32.5 %≈ 38′Nostalgia49 %53 %38 %34 %
37.5 %≈ 44′Nostalgia48 %51 %38 %24 %
42.5 %≈ 50′Nostalgia49 %49 %44 %29 %
47.5 %≈ 56′Nostalgia54 %51 %50 %42 %
52.5 %≈ 62′Nostalgia55 %50 %46 %44 %
57.5 %≈ 68′Curiosity43 %30 %30 %24 %
62.5 %≈ 74′Curiosity34 %18 %25 %10 %
67.5 %≈ 80′Empathy39 %29 %33 %13 %
72.5 %≈ 86′Nostalgia48 %46 %36 %20 %
77.5 %≈ 91′Nostalgia60 %57 %48 %35 %
82.5 %≈ 97′Sadness73 %56 %65 %55 %
87.5 %≈ 103′Love79 %53 %74 %69 %
92.5 %≈ 109′Love70 %46 %65 %60 %
97.5 %≈ 115′Empathy53 %35 %48 %38 %
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Arata Iura

Takashi Mochizuki

EO
Erika Oda

ST
Susumu Terajima

Susumu Terajima

Satoru Kawashima

TN
Takashi Naitô

Takuro Sugie

KT
Kei Tani

Kennosuke Nakamura

Kyōko Kagawa

Kyoko Watanabe

TY
Tōru Yuri

Gisuke Shoda

Yusuke Iseya

Yusuke Iseya

SY
Sayaka Yoshino

Kana Yoshino

KS
Kazuko Shirakawa

Nobuko Amano

KS
Kotaro Shiga

Kenji Yamamoto

HH
Hisako Hara

Kiyo Nishimura

NI
Natsuo Ishido

Young Kyoko Watanabe

AY
Akio Yokoyama

Security Guard

TN
Taketoshi Naitō

Ichiro Watanabe

SA
Sadao Abe

Young Watanabe

TK
Tae Kimura

Dining Hall Worker

MY
Miyako Yamaguchi

Dining Hall Worker

Details

Type
Movies
Released
1998
Runtime
118 min
Country
Japan
Genres
Drama, Fantasy
Ratings
★ IMDb 7.6 · 16,090 ratings
Feels mostly
Nostalgia
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.