Autumn in New York
2000 · 103 min · Director: Joan Chen
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Forty-eight year old Will Keane is a successful restaurateur and serial womanizer, his reputation generally preceding him. When he is introduced to twenty-two year old Charlotte Fielding by Charlotte's grandmother, Will's old friend Dolly who he has not seen in years, there is a mutual but slow to acknowledge attraction. After their first date, Will and Charlotte agree that their relationship will never progress to one of a long term standing, but for different reasons: while this is Will's somewhat standard modus operandi, Charlotte announces that she has a terminal heart condition. Charlotte's admission makes Will look at this relationship differently, he being told by his best friend John that if he is going to continue to date Charlotte that he better treat her well. Their relationship does end up being different than both expect, for Charlotte which could mean a change from her current "let me die in peace" attitude to want to fight for her life. And Will's time with Charlotte is further influenced by his encounter with a young woman named Lisa Tyler.
Emotional fingerprint
Autumn in New York (2000) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Sadness 35%, Love 25%, Melancholy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Sadness35%
- Love25%
- Melancholy20%
- Empathy10%
- Relief10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Sadness, Love, Melancholy. Genres: Drama, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Sadness, Love and Melancholy. Its IMDb rating of 5.6/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 59/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Sadness
- Love
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Sadness | Love | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Sadness | 35 % | 20 % | 13 % | 17 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Humor | 35 % | 8 % | 14 % | 13 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Humor | 36 % | 0 % | 19 % | 10 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Humor | 44 % | 3 % | 32 % | 9 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Love | 56 % | 20 % | 48 % | 14 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Sadness | 60 % | 44 % | 45 % | 26 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Sadness | 54 % | 44 % | 38 % | 27 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Love | 53 % | 36 % | 36 % | 28 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Sadness | 50 % | 34 % | 29 % | 35 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Love | 49 % | 34 % | 24 % | 41 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Sadness | 63 % | 51 % | 25 % | 53 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Sadness | 65 % | 58 % | 25 % | 50 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Hope | 60 % | 51 % | 33 % | 43 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Sadness | 71 % | 60 % | 46 % | 56 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Sadness | 79 % | 65 % | 54 % | 66 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Sadness | 71 % | 53 % | 46 % | 59 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 85′ | Hope | 66 % | 43 % | 41 % | 46 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Love | 75 % | 55 % | 57 % | 45 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Sadness | 83 % | 70 % | 70 % | 55 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 100′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Melissa
Netto
Fakir
Eriko
458 Waiter
458 Waiter
Details
- Directed by
- Joan Chen
- Written by
- Allison Burnett, Allison Burnett
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2000
- Runtime
- 103 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Sadness
- Data updated
Where to watch
Free
Also on
Availability varies by country
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
