Les acteurs
2000 · 103 min · Director: Bertrand Blier
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A self-conscious and self-referential adventure into the (pretend) lives of legendary actors in Paris.
Emotional fingerprint
Les acteurs (2000) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 40%, Curiosity 25%, Smile 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Curiosity, Smile. Genres: Comedy. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Curiosity and Smile. Its IMDb rating of 5.9/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 65/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Melancholy
- Curiosity
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Melancholy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Melancholy | Curiosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 52 % | 52 % | 14 % | 25 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Humor | 53 % | 53 % | 12 % | 26 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Humor | 53 % | 51 % | 14 % | 29 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Humor | 52 % | 50 % | 19 % | 27 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Humor | 54 % | 53 % | 17 % | 24 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Humor | 59 % | 57 % | 12 % | 24 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Humor | 57 % | 56 % | 16 % | 24 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Humor | 50 % | 48 % | 19 % | 28 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Curiosity | 46 % | 41 % | 18 % | 36 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Humor | 48 % | 43 % | 21 % | 36 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Humor | 52 % | 48 % | 20 % | 30 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Humor | 53 % | 48 % | 15 % | 26 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Humor | 54 % | 43 % | 20 % | 26 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Humor | 57 % | 38 % | 31 % | 26 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Empathy | 57 % | 38 % | 34 % | 24 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Humor | 55 % | 46 % | 24 % | 23 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 85′ | Humor | 54 % | 53 % | 18 % | 21 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Humor | 58 % | 46 % | 28 % | 20 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Melancholy | 62 % | 37 % | 45 % | 20 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 100′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Les acteurs. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Details
- Directed by
- Bertrand Blier
- Written by
- Bertrand Blier
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2000
- Runtime
- 103 min
- Country
- France
- Genres
- Comedy
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
