Down to Earth
2001 · 87 min · Director: Chris Weitz, Paul Weitz
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
It seems everyone is trying to get into heaven; at least those whose time is up. For Lance Barton (Chris Rock), a struggling comedian and bicycle messenger, it's the last thing on his mind. His due date in heaven is fifty years away. In the meantime, he has big dreams to pursue on Earth, such as landing a slot at the final Amateur Night Contest at the famed Apollo Theatre. Lance's has one little problem though - he isn't that funny. Thanks to an overly cautious emissary from heaven, Mr. Keyes (Eugene Levy), he's going to get hit (literally) with a much bigger problem. Showing that even God has difficulty finding good help these days, the inept minion mistakenly plucks Lance from a traffic accident - before it takes place. Transporting him to the Pearly Gates, or more accurately, the velvet roped-lines of the hottest club around, the error is finally addressed by Mr. King (Chazz Palminteri), the streetwise, no-nonsense head angel who manages the place from his plush windowed office. Since returning to his own body on Earth is impossible, the urban dwelling Lance reluctantly agrees to a normally unthinkable proposal. He'll occupy the body of a wealthy old white mogul, Charles Wellington III (Brian Rhodes), until a more suitable body can be found. Strangely enough, in a Park Avenue penthouse, servants and butlers become his new homeys as Lance works on his streetwise comedy routine for the big Apollo showdown. Living in the body of a callous old white man would be bizarre enough for Lance without falling in love with Sontee Jenkins (Regina King), the beautiful woman publicly battling Wellington's company at the same time. And if that wasn't enough, he has to deal with the love affair between Wellington's wife and his personal assistant, and their plot to have him killed.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Down to Earth (2001) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Excitement 25%, Love 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor35%
- Excitement25%
- Love20%
- Empathy10%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Excitement, Love. Genres: Comedy, Fantasy. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Excitement and Love. Its IMDb rating of 5.4/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 58/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Curiosity
- Love
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Curiosity | Love |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 43 % | 38 % | 32 % | 3 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Curiosity | 49 % | 40 % | 43 % | 1 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Curiosity | 51 % | 45 % | 49 % | 1 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Humor | 49 % | 48 % | 41 % | 4 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Humor | 49 % | 48 % | 31 % | 4 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Humor | 51 % | 49 % | 25 % | 3 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Humor | 53 % | 51 % | 20 % | 5 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Humor | 53 % | 49 % | 19 % | 8 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Humor | 54 % | 46 % | 20 % | 10 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Humor | 55 % | 51 % | 18 % | 21 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Humor | 56 % | 53 % | 18 % | 38 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Love | 55 % | 45 % | 26 % | 38 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Sadness | 53 % | 44 % | 31 % | 20 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Humor | 56 % | 49 % | 28 % | 20 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Love | 61 % | 43 % | 30 % | 34 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Sadness | 64 % | 41 % | 33 % | 31 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 72′ | Humor | 61 % | 48 % | 29 % | 24 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Sadness | 54 % | 41 % | 26 % | 28 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Love | 50 % | 37 % | 22 % | 37 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 85′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Rags to riches
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Gospel Singer
Rosa
Charles Wellington, III
Heckler (as Kedar)
Doorman
Singer
Singer
Singer
Details
- Directed by
- Chris Weitz, Paul Weitz
- Written by
- Warren Beatty, Chris Rock, Elaine May, Chris Rock, Louis C.K., Lance Crouther, Ali LeRoi
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2001
- Runtime
- 87 min
- Country
- Germany, Canada, Australia, United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





