Basic
2003 · 98 min · Director: John McTiernan
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Tom Hardy, an ex-Army Ranger turned DEA agent, is drawn into an ever-widening mystery surrounding the disappearance of the feared and often hated Sgt. Nathan West, as well as several of his elite Special Forces trainees on what appears, at first, to have been a routine training exercise during a hurricane in the jungles of Panama. Only two survivors are found, Dunbar, and a badly wounded Kendall, the son of a high-profile Joint Chiefs of Staff official. Neither is willing to cooperate with Capt. Julia Osborne's investigation. So base commander Col. Bill Styles calls in ex-Ranger Hardy, an old friend and a persuasive interrogator. Osborne disapproves of Hardy who is on leave from the D.E.A. after having come under suspicion of accepting bribes from local drug traffickers. She is also uneasy when she learns that Hardy once trained under West and hates him almost as passionately as his current recruits. With time running out, Hardy and Osborne call a temporary, if uneasy, truce. Hardy cajoles a confession out of Dunbar, who claims that Sgt. West and the missing Rangers have been murdered and their bodies blown away by the hurricane. When they later interview Kendall, he confirms that the other Rangers and West are dead. But, in almost every other way, his story contradicts Dunbar's. What happened to West and his Ranger team? And what were they really doing out there in the jungle? As each layer reveals more lies and greater deceptions, Hardy and Osborne inch towards the horrible truth about the fate of the missing Rangers.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Basic (2003) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Confusion 35%, Curiosity 25%, Tension 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Confusion, Curiosity, Tension. Genres: Drama, Mystery, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Confusion, Curiosity and Tension. Its IMDb rating of 6.4/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 68/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Curiosity
- Tension
- Surprise
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Surprise
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Curiosity | Tension | Surprise |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Curiosity | 58 % | 52 % | 55 % | 22 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Tension | 59 % | 55 % | 54 % | 25 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 57 % | 45 % | 19 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 50 % | 46 % | 13 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Tension | 56 % | 43 % | 50 % | 13 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 48 % | 48 % | 14 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Tension | 60 % | 54 % | 57 % | 25 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Tension | 69 % | 59 % | 69 % | 39 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Curiosity | 66 % | 64 % | 66 % | 36 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Curiosity | 65 % | 64 % | 65 % | 30 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Tension | 70 % | 61 % | 70 % | 32 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Tension | 68 % | 61 % | 66 % | 31 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Curiosity | 63 % | 66 % | 59 % | 30 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Curiosity | 70 % | 71 % | 65 % | 46 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Surprise | 79 % | 70 % | 75 % | 61 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Tension | 76 % | 65 % | 74 % | 60 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Surprise | 71 % | 65 % | 64 % | 60 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Curiosity | 68 % | 64 % | 46 % | 60 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Surprise | 63 % | 55 % | 30 % | 57 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 96′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Basic. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Basic — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Nurse #1
Nurse #2
Helicopter Pilot
CID Officer
G.I. on the Tarmac
Doctor
MP
Details
- Directed by
- John McTiernan
- Written by
- James Vanderbilt
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2003
- Runtime
- 98 min
- Country
- United States, United Kingdom
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Confusion
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





