feeldb

Adaptation.

2002 · 115 min · Director: Spike Jonze, Spike Jonze ★ IMDb 7.6 · 215,117 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

While his latest movie Being John Malkovich (1999) is in production, screenwriter Charlie Kaufman is hired by Valerie Thomas to adapt Susan Orlean's non-fiction book "The Orchid Thief" for the screen. Thomas bought the movie rights before Orlean wrote the book, when it was only an article in The New Yorker. The book details the story of rare orchid hunter John Laroche, whose passion for orchids and horticulture made Orlean discover passion and beauty for the first time in her life. Charlie wants to be faithful to the book in his adaptation, but despite Laroche himself being an interesting character in his own right, Charlie is having difficulty finding enough material in Laroche to fill a movie, while equally not having enough to say cinematically about the beauty of orchids. At the same time, Charlie is going through other issues in his life. His insecurity as a person doesn't allow him to act upon his feelings for Amelia Kavan, who is interested in him as a man. And Charlie's twin brother, pretentious Donald, has moved into his house with a goal of also becoming a screenwriter. Despite not admiring Donald as a screenwriter, Charlie asks for his advice. Together, they feel that there is some interesting subtext in the book on which Orlean herself can only elaborate, if only Charlie has the nerve to talk to her. If she can't or won't elaborate, they may have to find out the meaning of that subtext on their own.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Adaptation.

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Adaptation. (2002) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Confusion 28%, Humor 22%, Curiosity 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Humor22%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Confusion, Humor, Curiosity. Genres: Comedy, Drama. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Confusion, Humor and Curiosity. Its IMDb rating of 7.6/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 72/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Sadness
  • Tension
  • Hope

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Hope

Dominant emotion: Tension

Sadness
Tension
Hope
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 13 %, then rises around 78 %, then peaks around 88 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensitySadnessTensionHope
2.5 %≈ 3′Humor43 %22 %23 %7 %
7.5 %≈ 9′Curiosity41 %13 %18 %9 %
12.5 %≈ 14′Humor40 %13 %18 %11 %
17.5 %≈ 20′Humor43 %20 %16 %15 %
22.5 %≈ 26′Curiosity46 %19 %10 %16 %
27.5 %≈ 32′Humor45 %15 %9 %14 %
32.5 %≈ 37′Humor43 %20 %11 %14 %
37.5 %≈ 43′Humor44 %26 %19 %14 %
42.5 %≈ 49′Humor45 %30 %25 %14 %
47.5 %≈ 55′Sadness48 %36 %27 %14 %
52.5 %≈ 60′Sadness54 %41 %39 %9 %
57.5 %≈ 66′Sadness55 %36 %43 %13 %
62.5 %≈ 72′Hope50 %26 %33 %21 %
67.5 %≈ 78′Curiosity49 %28 %26 %19 %
72.5 %≈ 83′Curiosity55 %26 %34 %15 %
77.5 %≈ 89′Tension68 %19 %57 %19 %
82.5 %≈ 95′Tension81 %36 %79 %23 %
87.5 %≈ 101′Tension86 %64 %76 %23 %
92.5 %≈ 106′Sadness76 %54 %45 %35 %
97.5 %≈ 112′Hope65 %25 %15 %52 %
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Adaptation.. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Adaptation. — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Chris Cooper

John Laroche

Tilda Swinton

Valerie Thomas

JT
Jay Tavare

Matthew Osceola

L
Litefoot

Russell

RW
Roger Willie

Randy

JB
Jim Beaver

Ranger Tony

Cara Seymour

Amelia Kavan

Doug Jones

Augustus Margary

Gary Farmer

Buster Baxley

Peter Jason

Defense Attorney

Gregory Itzin

Prosecutor

CH
Curtis Hanson

Orlean's Husband

AN
Agnes NaDene Baddoo

Orlean Dinner Guest

PF
Paul Fortune

Orlean Dinner Guest

PJ
Paul Jasmin

Orlean Dinner Guest

LL
Lisa Love

Orlean Dinner Guest

WM
Wendy Mogel

Orlean Dinner Guest

DO
David O. Russell

Orlean Dinner Guest

Details

Written by
Charlie Kaufman, Susan Orlean
Type
Movies
Released
2002
Runtime
115 min
Country
United States
Genres
Comedy, Drama
Ratings
★ IMDb 7.6 · 215,117 ratings
Feels mostly
Confusion
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.