feeldb

Tadpole

2002 · 79 min · Director: Gary Winick ★ IMDb 6.1 · 6,436 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Beautiful, sophisticated women are all over Oscar Grubman. He is sensitive and compassionate, speaks French fluently, is passionate about Voltaire, and thinks the feature that tells the most about a woman is her hands. On the train home from Chauncey Academy for the Thanksgiving weekend, Oscar confides in his best friend that he has plans for this vacation--he will win the heart of his true love. But there is one major problem--Oscar's true love is his stepmother Eve. Oscar is certain that he could be a better mate to Eve than his work-obsessed father. He fails to win Eve's heart and is consequently dejected. Oscar's path to his true love is further crossed by Diane, Eve's best friend who, one night while wearing Eve's borrowed perfumed scarf, offers him temporary comfort in an unconventional tryst. For Diane, Oscar fills a void in her life. For Oscar, Diane is somewhat of a distraction, as his continued pursuit of Eve leads to an unexpected resolution.

Ask Kadri Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Tadpole (2002) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Confusion 28%, Empathy 22%, Love 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Love20%
  2. Humor12%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Confusion, Empathy, Love. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Confusion, Empathy and Love. Its IMDb rating of 6.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 61/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Humor
  • Tension
  • Empathy

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Love

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Empathy

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Humor
Tension
Empathy
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 8 %, then peaks around 63 %, then peaks around 83 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityHumorTensionEmpathy
2.5 %≈ 2′Humor37 %33 %7 %17 %
7.5 %≈ 6′Love36 %31 %10 %21 %
12.5 %≈ 10′Humor44 %35 %21 %28 %
17.5 %≈ 14′Tension54 %41 %36 %27 %
22.5 %≈ 18′Humor54 %48 %36 %23 %
27.5 %≈ 22′Humor48 %46 %24 %23 %
32.5 %≈ 26′Humor46 %43 %20 %25 %
37.5 %≈ 30′Humor50 %44 %31 %25 %
42.5 %≈ 34′Humor55 %49 %41 %26 %
47.5 %≈ 38′Humor54 %49 %39 %24 %
52.5 %≈ 41′Humor55 %46 %44 %23 %
57.5 %≈ 45′Tension66 %49 %59 %31 %
62.5 %≈ 49′Tension68 %48 %55 %40 %
67.5 %≈ 53′Humor60 %41 %40 %46 %
72.5 %≈ 57′Empathy55 %29 %35 %49 %
77.5 %≈ 61′Sadness54 %19 %29 %49 %
82.5 %≈ 65′Empathy58 %18 %20 %53 %
87.5 %≈ 69′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
92.5 %≈ 73′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
97.5 %≈ 77′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Tadpole. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Tadpole — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Aaron Stanford

Oscar Grubman

AS
Aaron Stanford

John Ritter

Stanley Grubman

Bebe Neuwirth

Diane Lodder

RI
Robert Iler

Charlie

PA
Peter Appel

Jimmy - Doorman

AV
Alicia Van Couvering

Daphne Tisch

Kate Mara

Miranda Spear

Ron Rifkin

Professor Tisch

PB
Paul Butler

Professor Sherman

HC
Hope Chernov

Samantha Steadman

DA
Debbon Ayer

Jean

MC
Michael Connors

Man in Bar

TK
Theo Kogan

Woman in Bar

HK
Harry Kellerman

Tea Waiter

RK
Reade Kelly

Mr. Smith

DD
Danielle Di Vecchio

Mrs. Smith

JF
John Feltch

Mr. Bob Spear

HB
Henri Binje

Le Gardin Waiter

Details

Directed by
Gary Winick
Written by
Gary Winick, Heather McGowan, Niels Mueller
Type
Movies
Released
2002
Runtime
79 min
Country
United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.1 · 6,436 ratings
Feels mostly
Confusion
Data updated

Where to watch

Also on

Availability varies by country

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.