Spun
2002 · 101 min · Director: Jonas Åkerlund
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A drug dealer introduces one of his customers, a 'speed freak', to the man who runs the meth lab. A crazy three-day adventure ensues.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Spun (2002) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Disturbing 30%, Anxiety 25%, Confusion 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Disturbing30%
- Anxiety25%
- Confusion20%
- Humor15%
- Fear10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Disturbing, Anxiety, Confusion. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Disturbing, Anxiety and Confusion. Its IMDb rating of 6.7/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 69/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Disturbing
- Tension
- Sadness
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Sympathy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Disturbing | Tension | Sadness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 42 % | 22 % | 38 % | 2 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Tension | 44 % | 28 % | 40 % | 6 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Disturbing | 36 % | 26 % | 28 % | 13 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Humor | 40 % | 33 % | 29 % | 18 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Disturbing | 51 % | 43 % | 43 % | 20 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Humor | 44 % | 33 % | 35 % | 15 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Humor | 37 % | 25 % | 29 % | 6 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Humor | 44 % | 31 % | 38 % | 11 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Sadness | 53 % | 43 % | 46 % | 29 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Disturbing | 64 % | 57 % | 55 % | 39 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Disturbing | 65 % | 57 % | 54 % | 34 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Humor | 57 % | 45 % | 46 % | 19 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Tension | 64 % | 50 % | 57 % | 14 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Tension | 73 % | 61 % | 64 % | 28 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Sympathy | 63 % | 49 % | 44 % | 36 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Humor | 51 % | 31 % | 35 % | 30 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Tension | 49 % | 29 % | 39 % | 25 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Humor | 51 % | 36 % | 31 % | 35 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Sadness | 56 % | 41 % | 23 % | 50 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Sadness | 52 % | 32 % | 17 % | 50 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
April Love
Giggles
La Sadgirl
Escort
Pornclerk
Doorman
Details
- Directed by
- Jonas Åkerlund
- Written by
- Will De Los Santos, Creighton Vero
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2002
- Runtime
- 101 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Disturbing
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





