feeldb

Auto Focus

2002 · 104 min · Director: Paul Schrader ★ IMDb 6.7 · 16,185 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

In 1965, Bob Crane, who had achieved some earlier success as a television supporting actor, was working as a successful morning radio DJ at KNX Los Angeles. Despite enjoying his work, photography (especially of the female form) and drumming, Crane wanted to be a movie star. So it was with some reluctance that he accepted the title starring role in a new television sitcom called Hogan's Heroes (1965), a WWII POW comedy. To his surprise, the show became a hit and catapulted him to television stardom. The fame resulting from the show led to excesses and a meeting with home video salesman and technician John Carpenter, with who he would form a friendship based on their mutual interests, namely excessive sex (for Crane, purely heterosexual sex) and capturing nude females on celluloid. His fame allowed Crane to have as much sex as he wanted, which was incongruent to his somewhat wholesome television friendly image, and the way he portrayed himself to almost everyone except Carpenter and his extramarital sex partners. His sex addiction was somewhat known but ignored by his high school sweetheart/first wife Anne Crane née Terzian, but well known by his second wife, Patti Olson, better known as Sigrid Valdis, his Hogan's Heroes co-star. Especially after the end of Hogan's Heroes in 1971, this incongruence and his friendship with Carpenter, with who he would have a continuing love/hate relationship, would contribute to both his professional and personal downfall.

Trailer for Auto Focus

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Auto Focus (2002) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Sadness 30%, Anxiety 25%, Empathy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Sadness, Anxiety, Empathy. Genres: Drama, Crime, Biography. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Sadness, Anxiety and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 6.7/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 69/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitlesapproximate
  • Sadness
  • Tension
  • Humor

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Disturbing

Sadness
Tension
Humor
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then dips around 18 %, then peaks around 93 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensitySadnessTensionHumor
2.5 %≈ 3′Humor36 %2 %11 %35 %
7.5 %≈ 8′Humor37 %6 %19 %31 %
12.5 %≈ 13′Curiosity35 %9 %23 %26 %
17.5 %≈ 18′Humor34 %6 %20 %26 %
22.5 %≈ 23′Humor35 %3 %17 %28 %
27.5 %≈ 29′Humor37 %8 %18 %28 %
32.5 %≈ 34′Sadness38 %15 %26 %28 %
37.5 %≈ 39′Tension40 %13 %33 %26 %
42.5 %≈ 44′Disturbing41 %11 %32 %23 %
47.5 %≈ 49′Humor44 %22 %32 %20 %
52.5 %≈ 55′Sadness47 %35 %35 %16 %
57.5 %≈ 60′Sadness41 %29 %30 %20 %
62.5 %≈ 65′Humor36 %18 %25 %25 %
67.5 %≈ 70′Tension41 %20 %33 %23 %
72.5 %≈ 75′Tension48 %29 %40 %21 %
77.5 %≈ 81′Sadness52 %42 %38 %16 %
82.5 %≈ 86′Sadness53 %47 %40 %9 %
87.5 %≈ 91′Tension57 %45 %48 %6 %
92.5 %≈ 96′Sadness61 %47 %50 %4 %
97.5 %≈ 101′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Rita Wilson

Anne Crane

RL
Ron Leibman

Lenny

Kurt Fuller

Werner Klemperer

Ed Begley Jr.

Mel Rosen

ME
Michael E. Rodgers

Richard Dawson

Michael McKean

Video Executive

CN
Christopher Neiman

Robert Clary

BS
Bruce Solomon

Edward H. Feldman

LK
Lyle Kanouse

John Banner

DR
DonnaMarie Recco

Melissa / Mistress Victoria

CL
Cheryl Lynn Bowers

Cynthia Lynn

Don McManus

Priest

SU
Sarah Uhrich

Victoria Berry

AN
Amanda Niles

Cocktail Waitress

KP
Kelly Packard

Dawson's Blond

JH
Jeff Harlan

Armand

Kevin Kilner

Clayton Moore

Details

Directed by
Paul Schrader
Written by
Robert Graysmith, Michael Gerbosi
Type
Movies
Released
2002
Runtime
104 min
Country
United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.7 · 16,185 ratings
Feels mostly
Sadness
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.