feeldb

American Splendor

2003 · 101 min · Director: Shari Springer Berman, Robert Pulcini ★ IMDb 7.4 · 55,197 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Harvey Pekar is file clerk at the local VA hospital. His interactions with his co-workers offer some relief from the monotony, and their discussions encompass everything from music to the decline of American culture to new flavors of jellybeans and life itself. At home, Harvey fills his days with reading, writing and listening to jazz. His apartment is filled with thousands of books and LPs, and he regularly scours Cleveland's thrift stores and garage sales for more, savoring the rare joy of a 25-cent find. It is at one of these junk sales that Harvey meets Robert Crumb, a greeting card artist and music enthusiast. When, years later, Crumb finds international success for his underground comics, the idea that comic books can be a valid art form for adults inspires Harvey to write his own brand of comic book. An admirer of naturalist writers like Theodore Dreiser, Harvey makes his American Splendor a truthful, unsentimental record of his working-class life, a warts-and-all self portrait. First published in 1976, the comic earns Harvey cult fame throughout the 1980s and eventually leads him to the sardonic Joyce Barber, a partner in a Delaware comic book store who end ups being Harvey's true soul mate as they experience the bizarre byproducts of Harvey's cult celebrity stature.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for American Splendor

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

American Splendor (2003) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Empathy 25%, Melancholy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Humor30%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Empathy, Melancholy. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Biography. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Empathy and Melancholy. Its IMDb rating of 7.4/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 73/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Empathy
  • Sadness
  • Humor

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Empathy

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Relief

Empathy
Sadness
Humor
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 13 %, then rises around 73 %, then peaks around 88 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityEmpathySadnessHumor
2.5 %≈ 3′Humor45 %30 %27 %35 %
7.5 %≈ 8′Sadness45 %35 %30 %29 %
12.5 %≈ 13′Humor39 %29 %21 %28 %
17.5 %≈ 18′Humor39 %25 %16 %31 %
22.5 %≈ 23′Humor44 %28 %16 %35 %
27.5 %≈ 28′Humor48 %33 %25 %36 %
32.5 %≈ 33′Sadness55 %46 %46 %26 %
37.5 %≈ 38′Sadness56 %51 %49 %20 %
42.5 %≈ 43′Humor50 %44 %25 %29 %
47.5 %≈ 48′Empathy50 %38 %11 %39 %
52.5 %≈ 53′Humor49 %30 %18 %43 %
57.5 %≈ 58′Humor44 %25 %21 %38 %
62.5 %≈ 63′Humor45 %25 %16 %35 %
67.5 %≈ 68′Humor51 %29 %16 %34 %
72.5 %≈ 73′Tension61 %43 %32 %21 %
77.5 %≈ 78′Tension69 %58 %50 %10 %
82.5 %≈ 83′Empathy73 %66 %61 %5 %
87.5 %≈ 88′Sadness78 %70 %59 %6 %
92.5 %≈ 93′Relief74 %61 %35 %20 %
97.5 %≈ 98′Humor65 %50 %22 %33 %
Cinderella

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about American Splendor. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about American Splendor — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Paul Giamatti

Harvey Pekar

Hope Davis

Joyce Brabner

HP
Harvey Pekar

Judah Friedlander

Toby Radloff

James Urbaniak

Robert Crumb

EB
Earl Billings

Mr. Boats

MM
Maggie Moore

Alice Quinn

VB
Vivienne Benesch

Lana

DT
Daniel Tay

Young Harvey

Donal Logue

Stage Actor Harvey

JB
Joyce Brabner

Joyce Brabner

Molly Shannon

Stage Actor Joyce

TR
Toby Radloff

Toby Radloff

EM
Eytan Mirsky

Guitarist

JK
Joey Krajcar

Batman

CA
Chris Ambrose

Superman

CC
Cameron Carter

Green Lantern

MF
Mary Faktor

Housewife

Details

Written by
Shari Springer Berman, Robert Pulcini, Harvey Pekar, Joyce Brabner
Type
Movies
Released
2003
Runtime
101 min
Country
United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 7.4 · 55,197 ratings
Feels mostly
Humor
Data updated

Where to watch

Also on

Availability varies by country

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.