feeldb

Bowling for Columbine

2002 · 120 min · Director: Michael Moore ★ IMDb 7.9 · 152,878 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

The United States of America is notorious for its astronomical number of people killed by firearms for a developed nation without a civil war. With his signature sense of angry humor, activist filmmaker Michael Moore sets out to explore the roots of this bloodshed. In doing so, he learns that the conventional answers of easy availability of guns, violent national history, violent entertainment and even poverty are inadequate to explain this violence when other cultures share those same factors without the equivalent carnage. In order to arrive at a possible explanation, Michael Moore takes on a deeper examination of America's culture of fear, bigotry and violence in a nation with widespread gun ownership. Furthermore, he seeks to investigate and confront the powerful elite political and corporate interests fanning this culture for their own unscrupulous gain.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Bowling for Columbine

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Bowling for Columbine (2002) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anger 30%, Confusion 25%, Humor 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

30%Anger
20%Humor
  1. Anger30%
  2. Humor20%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Anger, Confusion, Humor. Genres: Drama, Documentary, Crime. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Anger, Confusion and Humor. Its IMDb rating of 7.9/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 74/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Disturbing
  • Sadness
  • Curiosity

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Disturbing

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Disturbing
Sadness
Curiosity
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then peaks around 28 %, then dips around 63 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityDisturbingSadnessCuriosity
2.5 %≈ 3′Curiosity47 %28 %3 %52 %
7.5 %≈ 9′Humor53 %40 %11 %46 %
12.5 %≈ 15′Disturbing56 %51 %19 %43 %
17.5 %≈ 21′Curiosity59 %56 %29 %39 %
22.5 %≈ 27′Disturbing74 %71 %52 %27 %
27.5 %≈ 33′Disturbing81 %71 %68 %23 %
32.5 %≈ 39′Sadness68 %49 %54 %35 %
37.5 %≈ 45′Curiosity55 %40 %34 %53 %
42.5 %≈ 51′Curiosity55 %46 %30 %58 %
47.5 %≈ 57′Disturbing57 %51 %31 %51 %
52.5 %≈ 63′Curiosity56 %51 %27 %49 %
57.5 %≈ 69′Curiosity53 %43 %20 %54 %
62.5 %≈ 75′Curiosity49 %30 %19 %57 %
67.5 %≈ 81′Curiosity57 %36 %41 %46 %
72.5 %≈ 87′Sadness71 %50 %66 %34 %
77.5 %≈ 93′Sadness70 %50 %65 %38 %
82.5 %≈ 99′Sadness64 %44 %50 %46 %
87.5 %≈ 105′Curiosity60 %35 %32 %55 %
92.5 %≈ 111′Curiosity60 %34 %32 %51 %
97.5 %≈ 117′Sadness65 %38 %52 %37 %
Oedipus

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Bowling for Columbine. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Bowling for Columbine — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Charlton Heston

Self - NRA President

JÁ
Jacobo Árbenz

Self - President of Guatemala

MB
Mike Bradley

Self - Mayor of Sarnia, Ontario, Canada

DC
Dick Clark

Self

AA
Arthur A. Busch

Self - County Prosecutor: Flint, Michigan

MC
Michael Caldwell

Self - Police Detective

RC
Richard Castaldo

Self - Columbine Victim

SD
Steve Davis

Self - Deputy Sheriff

ND
Ngo Dinh Diem

Self - President of South Vietnam

ME
Mike Epstein

Self - Shopper in Mall

JF
Joe Farmer

Self - Superintendent of Schools

BB
Brooks Brown

Self

DH
Dick Herlan

Self

Details

Directed by
Michael Moore
Written by
Michael Moore
Type
Movies
Released
2002
Runtime
120 min
Country
United States, Canada, Germany
Ratings
★ IMDb 7.9 · 152,878 ratings
Feels mostly
Anger
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.