Confidence
2003 · 97 min · Director: James Foley
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Jake Vig leads a small Los Angeles based team of grifters, each member who has his specific role in each con: Jake is the main man, Miles the adversary, Big Al the scared innocent bystander, and Gordo the dead shooting victim. He also has in his pockets crooked LAPD detectives Lloyd Whitworth and Omar Manzano who basically play themselves as needed. Beyond getting the money, the basic goal of each con is to ensure the mark is so scared by what has happened - usually being an accomplice in a "murder" - that he won't come back looking for the money. Jake learns the hard way that their latest mark, Louis Dolby, who they fleeced for $150,000, was carrying money for a criminal named King, who takes a no prisoners approach in getting even, he who knows who stole his money. Instead of returning the $150,000 to King, money which he no longer has anyway, Jake convinces King to parlay that money and a bit more into a bigger con against a mark of King's choice, that person being banker Morgan Price, a second generation mobster. The total take for this con is to be $5 million. Beyond co-opting a couple of inside people for this con, King wants one of his own men inserted - Lupus - and Jake also enlists the work of a female pickpocket he recently ran across named Lily, to who he is attracted. During the process, a small wrinkle occurs when they learn that Special Agent Gunther Butan with the US Customs Agency, an old adversary of Jake's, is currently after him, which means they either have to call off the international mission or watch more carefully their movements, with Jake not to be the one to carry any money across the border. But with a group of con artists working for the first time with new players, a question becomes are there any inside cons at play, especially in this case where Jake has more of a personal stake than usual.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Confidence (2003) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Tension 30%, Anxiety 22%, Excitement 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Tension30%
- Anxiety22%
- Excitement20%
- Curiosity15%
- Satisfaction13%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Tension, Anxiety, Excitement. Genres: Thriller, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Tension, Anxiety and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 6.6/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 67/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Curiosity
- Humor
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Melancholy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Curiosity | Humor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Tension | 65 % | 58 % | 50 % | 35 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Curiosity | 57 % | 49 % | 50 % | 32 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Tension | 52 % | 44 % | 48 % | 29 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Curiosity | 50 % | 43 % | 41 % | 33 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Tension | 54 % | 46 % | 41 % | 38 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Curiosity | 58 % | 49 % | 51 % | 34 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 45 % | 54 % | 34 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Humor | 53 % | 44 % | 48 % | 36 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Tension | 54 % | 49 % | 48 % | 31 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 53 % | 49 % | 30 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Tension | 54 % | 46 % | 48 % | 34 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Curiosity | 49 % | 34 % | 49 % | 31 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Curiosity | 51 % | 36 % | 51 % | 24 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Tension | 60 % | 54 % | 50 % | 19 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Tension | 65 % | 63 % | 49 % | 18 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Curiosity | 67 % | 65 % | 55 % | 20 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Tension | 73 % | 73 % | 61 % | 24 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 85′ | Tension | 78 % | 76 % | 61 % | 24 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Tension | 68 % | 59 % | 46 % | 16 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Melancholy | 53 % | 33 % | 25 % | 7 % |
Icarus
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Lupus
Attractive Blonde
Katie
Nicole
Michelle Strigo
Details
- Directed by
- James Foley
- Written by
- Doug Jung
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2003
- Runtime
- 97 min
- Country
- United States, Canada, Germany
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Tension
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





