Man of the House
2005 · 100 min · Director: Stephen Herek
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
When a key informant against a notorious crime boss is assassinated, the only witnesses to his murder are five lively cheerleaders from the University of Texas: Barb, Anne, Evie, Heather, and Teresa. With the girls' lives in danger until the authorities discover the killer, the hard-headed Texas Ranger, Roland Sharp, has to go undercover and move in with them at a secret safe house, as the mysterious murderer is still at large. However, to effectively protect the teenage quintet of eyewitnesses, Sharp must first lay down the ground rules for a harmonious, and above all, safe coexistence. Will the man of the house succeed in his mission?
Emotional fingerprint
Man of the House (2005) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Excitement 20%, Tension 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor35%
- Excitement20%
- Tension20%
- Empathy15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Excitement, Tension. Genres: Comedy, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Excitement and Tension. Its IMDb rating of 5.5/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 57/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Love
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Love | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 50 % | 40 % | 2 % | 37 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Tension | 53 % | 36 % | 8 % | 40 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Humor | 50 % | 40 % | 11 % | 31 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Humor | 45 % | 43 % | 5 % | 29 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Humor | 43 % | 40 % | 0 % | 30 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Humor | 44 % | 43 % | 3 % | 23 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Humor | 45 % | 45 % | 6 % | 15 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Humor | 49 % | 49 % | 6 % | 15 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Humor | 54 % | 48 % | 11 % | 24 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Empathy | 55 % | 43 % | 24 % | 28 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Humor | 53 % | 46 % | 31 % | 16 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Humor | 49 % | 49 % | 30 % | 6 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Humor | 50 % | 49 % | 31 % | 6 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Love | 51 % | 48 % | 38 % | 11 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Humor | 54 % | 40 % | 30 % | 30 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Tension | 66 % | 31 % | 16 % | 60 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Tension | 75 % | 30 % | 26 % | 68 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Love | 73 % | 39 % | 53 % | 40 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Joy | 70 % | 47 % | 65 % | 13 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Rags to riches
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Maggie Swanson
Pizza Delivery Guy
Jack Carter
Details
- Directed by
- Stephen Herek
- Written by
- Robert Ramsey, Matthew Stone, John J. McLaughlin, Scott Lobdell, Robert Ramsey
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2005
- Runtime
- 100 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
