Fever Pitch
2005 · 104 min · Director: Peter Farrelly, Bobby Farrelly
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
When relaxed and charming Ben Wrightman meets workaholic Lindsey Meeks she finds him sweet and charming, they hit it off and when it is winter Ben can spend every waking hour with Lindsey, but when summer comes around the corner Lindsey discovers Ben's obsession with the Boston Red Sox. She thinks it is perfect until everything goes downhill for them.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Fever Pitch (2005) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Love 30%, Humor 25%, Excitement 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Love30%
- Humor25%
- Excitement20%
- Sadness15%
- Relief10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Love, Humor, Excitement. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Love, Humor and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 6.3/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 65/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Love
- Joy
- Humor
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Love | Joy | Humor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 35 % | 7 % | 10 % | 35 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Humor | 41 % | 13 % | 9 % | 39 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Humor | 45 % | 24 % | 11 % | 40 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Humor | 45 % | 30 % | 19 % | 43 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Humor | 48 % | 34 % | 25 % | 44 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Love | 48 % | 36 % | 27 % | 40 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Humor | 43 % | 30 % | 29 % | 38 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Joy | 41 % | 25 % | 30 % | 38 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Humor | 41 % | 24 % | 26 % | 35 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Humor | 41 % | 23 % | 23 % | 30 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Tension | 44 % | 21 % | 19 % | 28 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Tension | 45 % | 23 % | 11 % | 24 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Sadness | 49 % | 33 % | 18 % | 19 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Joy | 55 % | 35 % | 28 % | 20 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Tension | 56 % | 23 % | 16 % | 21 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Sadness | 59 % | 23 % | 5 % | 19 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Sadness | 66 % | 39 % | 13 % | 16 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Love | 71 % | 54 % | 35 % | 20 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 96′ | Joy | 73 % | 62 % | 55 % | 28 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 101′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Ben - 1980
Viv
Ryan
Troy
Tammy
Charlene
Casey
Christie
Details
- Directed by
- Peter Farrelly, Bobby Farrelly
- Written by
- Lowell Ganz, Babaloo Mandel, Nick Hornby
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2005
- Runtime
- 104 min
- Country
- United States, Germany
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Love
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Also on
Availability varies by country
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





