feeldb

Shopgirl

2005 · 104 min · Director: Anand Tucker ★ IMDb 6.3 · 25,496 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Twenty-something native Vermonter Mirabelle Buttersfield, having recently graduated from college, is finding her new life in Los Angeles not quite what she was expecting or hoping. An aspiring artist, she is barely eking out a living working as a clerk at the women's evening gloves counter at Saks Fifth Avenue in Beverly Hills and thus she can barely make the payments on her massive student loans. She treats her job with a certain distance, often daydreaming as she watches the life of the rich as they shop at the store. She has made no friends, including from among her Saks colleagues, and thus lives a solitary existence, which does not assist in her dealing with her chronic clinical depression. So it is with some surprise that two men with a romantic interest in her enter her life almost simultaneously. The first is poor slacker Jeremy, who works as an amplifier salesman/font designer. Mirabelle continues dating Jeremy as only a relief to her solitary life, as Jeremy doesn't seem to understand how to treat her in the way she wants. Shortly after meeting Jeremy, she meets the second, wealthy fifty-something Ray Porter, who is the antithesis of Jeremy in almost every respect, including the fact that Ray is unwilling or unable to commit to Mirabelle, about which he is up front to her. To Mirabelle, that lack of commitment from Ray seems to be in name only, and as such she increasingly sees Ray as her boyfriend. Mirabelle has to decide if a long term future is either in the cards with Jeremy or Ray, which is made all the more complicated by an action by Jeremy to an off the cuff comment that she makes to him.

Trailer for Shopgirl

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Shopgirl (2005) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Sadness 30%, Empathy 25%, Love 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

20%Love
  1. Love20%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Sadness, Empathy, Love. Genres: Drama, Romance. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Sadness, Empathy and Love. Its IMDb rating of 6.3/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 65/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Love
  • Sadness
  • Empathy

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Empathy

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Love

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Love
Sadness
Empathy
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 38 %, then rises around 78 %, then peaks around 88 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityLoveSadnessEmpathy
2.5 %≈ 3′Empathy48 %10 %33 %43 %
7.5 %≈ 8′Humor48 %13 %24 %34 %
12.5 %≈ 13′Humor50 %16 %15 %25 %
17.5 %≈ 18′Humor53 %15 %11 %20 %
22.5 %≈ 23′Humor49 %15 %9 %18 %
27.5 %≈ 29′Humor43 %24 %9 %21 %
32.5 %≈ 34′Love39 %31 %11 %25 %
37.5 %≈ 39′Love39 %27 %16 %26 %
42.5 %≈ 44′Sadness44 %25 %23 %32 %
47.5 %≈ 49′Love53 %33 %30 %45 %
52.5 %≈ 55′Empathy56 %38 %35 %51 %
57.5 %≈ 60′Love56 %32 %39 %50 %
62.5 %≈ 65′Sadness59 %26 %45 %53 %
67.5 %≈ 70′Empathy53 %28 %34 %44 %
72.5 %≈ 75′Humor49 %26 %28 %35 %
77.5 %≈ 81′Sadness60 %33 %43 %45 %
82.5 %≈ 86′Love71 %56 %48 %54 %
87.5 %≈ 91′Love75 %60 %51 %57 %
92.5 %≈ 96′Sadness73 %42 %60 %60 %
97.5 %≈ 101′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Cinderella

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Bridgette Wilson

Lisa Cramer

Sam Bottoms

Dan Buttersfield

Frances Conroy

Catherine Buttersfield

Rebecca Pidgeon

Christie Richards

GD
Gina Doctor

Del Rey

SS
Samantha Shelton

Loki

Clyde Kusatsu

Mr. Agasa

RR
Romy Rosemont

Loan Officer

JS
Joshua Snyder

Trey Bryan

Rachel Nichols

Trey's Girlfriend

SE
Shane Edelman

Chet

EK
Emily Kuroda

Japanese Woman

JS
Jayzel Samonte

Houseboy

MK
Mark Kozelek

Luther

DS
Dana Schick

Hailey

JF
John Fedevich

Hot Tears Band Member

ZS
Zak Sally

Hot Tears Band Member

Details

Directed by
Anand Tucker
Written by
Steve Martin
Type
Movies
Released
2005
Runtime
104 min
Country
United States
Genres
Drama, Romance
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.3 · 25,496 ratings
Feels mostly
Sadness
Data updated

Where to watch

Also on

Availability varies by country

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.